2017
DOI: 10.1093/imaiai/iaw021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensionality-reduced subspace clustering

Abstract: Subspace clustering refers to the problem of clustering unlabeled high-dimensional data points into a union of low-dimensional linear subspaces, whose number, orientations and dimensions are all unknown. In practice, one may have access to dimensionality-reduced observations of the data only, resulting, e.g., from undersampling due to complexity and speed constraints on the acquisition device or mechanism. More pertinently, even if the high-dimensional data set is available, it is often desirable to first proj… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 8. One can sketch data more aggressively if the subspaces are not similar to each other [70]. This is also captured in Corollary 3 as follows.…”
Section: B Sketching Algorithms For Subspace Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Remark 8. One can sketch data more aggressively if the subspaces are not similar to each other [70]. This is also captured in Corollary 3 as follows.…”
Section: B Sketching Algorithms For Subspace Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To follow the same path, we also perform PCA on the feature vectors. However, one can instead use randomized dimension reduction methods that are shown to be useful for achieving high accuracy in the SSC framework [28,29,30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect is that OSC tends to assign non-zero weights to the same points as SSC and additionally selects neighbors of these points in terms of Euclidean distance. All of the above methods, including OSC, can be carried out on dimensionality reduced data points, in the spirit of [19,9]. We compare the performance of these methods in Section 5.…”
Section: Relation To Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%