2016
DOI: 10.1134/s0965542516060129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct numerical simulation of laminar–turbulent flow over a flat plate at hypersonic flow speeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
6
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This location also matches the streamwise station beyond which the spanwise spectra switch over from a narrowband form (peak energy near or ) to one where a wide range of low wavenumbers are energized (discussed previously in figure 12 a ). By the end of the domain, , the value is , which is consistent with the turbulent skin-friction value reported in Egorov & Novikov (2016) for identical free stream conditions (marked with a solid circle). The wall-normal profile of streamwise velocity in terms of wall units () and friction velocity () at this location are provided in figure 16( b ).…”
Section: Turbulent Hbl and Near-wall Effectssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This location also matches the streamwise station beyond which the spanwise spectra switch over from a narrowband form (peak energy near or ) to one where a wide range of low wavenumbers are energized (discussed previously in figure 12 a ). By the end of the domain, , the value is , which is consistent with the turbulent skin-friction value reported in Egorov & Novikov (2016) for identical free stream conditions (marked with a solid circle). The wall-normal profile of streamwise velocity in terms of wall units () and friction velocity () at this location are provided in figure 16( b ).…”
Section: Turbulent Hbl and Near-wall Effectssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The pressure perturbation contours in figure 6( a ) indicate waves accumulating behind the shock wave, as well as amplifying within the boundary layer. Unlike the linear scenario, pressure perturbations here show occasional extensions into the free stream, as was also observed in the nonlinear behaviour of second-mode by Egorov & Novikov (2016). The region marked by the rectangle (in figure 6 a ) is magnified in figure 6( b ) for a detailed representation of the pressure perturbation contours.…”
Section: Nonlinear Evolution Of Second-modesupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In some cases, it is possible a priori (before making calculations) to state that vortex lines and tubes will be closed (for example, a flow behind a detached shock wave [22]) and checking the closure of vortex lines can serve to verify the calculations. In other cases, closed vortex tubes are detected as a result of a calculation (for example, [23][24][25][26][27][28]), and checking the regularities specific to vortex tubes would allow verification of the calculation. This article is devoted to the search for such regularities in the general 3D case for continuous flows of fluid and gas, hereinafter called as fluid flows.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%