1989
DOI: 10.1121/1.398224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directional sensitivity of sound-pressure levels in the human ear canal

Abstract: Changes in sound pressures measured in the ear canal are reported for broadband sound sources positioned at various locations about the subject. These location-dependent pressures are one source of acoustical cues for sound localization by human listeners. Sound source locations were tested with horizontal and vertical resolution of 10 degrees. Sound levels were measured with miniature microphones placed inside the two ear canals. Although the measured amplitude spectra varied with the position of the micropho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
120
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
11
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intensity cues are highly frequency dependent for all species (e.g., Harrison and Downey, 1970;Knudsen, 1980;Palmer and King, 1985;Middlebrooks et al, 1989;Musicant et al, 1990), and therefore the problems involved in constructing these maps are comparable to those involved in constructing the representation of elevation in the barn owl. Figure 14 and Table 4 demonstrate that elevational tuning errors in barn owls correlate with the frequency dependence of the intensity cues, and we expect that in other species the importance of vision for calibrating different portions of the auditory map may also vary with the frequency dependence of the cues.…”
Section: Discussion Effects Of Blind Rearing On Auditory Responses Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Intensity cues are highly frequency dependent for all species (e.g., Harrison and Downey, 1970;Knudsen, 1980;Palmer and King, 1985;Middlebrooks et al, 1989;Musicant et al, 1990), and therefore the problems involved in constructing these maps are comparable to those involved in constructing the representation of elevation in the barn owl. Figure 14 and Table 4 demonstrate that elevational tuning errors in barn owls correlate with the frequency dependence of the intensity cues, and we expect that in other species the importance of vision for calibrating different portions of the auditory map may also vary with the frequency dependence of the cues.…”
Section: Discussion Effects Of Blind Rearing On Auditory Responses Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8) 12A; 13C,D) and therefore are predictable. In species with symmetrical ears, these properties apply to binaural cues corresponding with sources located along the midsagittal plane (Moore and Irvine, 1979;Middlebrooks et al, 1989;Musicant et al, 1990). The consistency of cue values through development and across generations could permit genetically determined mechanisms to establish connections between neurons coding for 0-dB IID and 0-psec ITD with the representation of frontal space in the tectum.…”
Section: Efects Of Blind Rearing On Sound Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2G) particularly for lateral angles associated with the pinna axis over the mid to high frequencies at lateral angles between 30°and 60°( e.g. Middlebrooks et al 1989). So as to compare the acoustic effects produced by our moulds with data obtained in their work, we have calculated the SI according to van Wanrooij and van Opstal (2005).…”
Section: Acoustic Effects Of the Mouldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, these could arise purely from motor errors; alternatively, they could at least partially come about because the auditory space map itself is compressed. The latter scenario could result from limitations in the encoding of binaural cues, for example, because symmetrical ears are most sensitive to interaural differences in the frontal hemifield (Sandel et al, 1955;Middlebrooks et al, 1989). Adding to this, the extent of these underestimations can vary between adjacent targets and these deviations can be large relative to distribution variance.…”
Section: Relating Behavioral Measures To Neural Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%