“…The accuracy of downscaled soil moisture product in this study appears to be very good as compared to, for example, Mishra et al (), who reported the CONUS average correlation between the thermal‐infrared downscaled SMAP (passive) and SCAN is around 0.54, while in this study, the correlation between the downscaled SMAP product and SCAN networks is 0.65. However, it is noted that the successful use of a downscaling approach may be restricted to its certain characteristics and needs of a user, knowing that each method may have certain strengths and weaknesses (Chakrabarti et al, , ; Chakrabarti, Judge, et al, ; Colliander, Fisher, et al, ). For example, in the work by Colliander, Fisher, et al (), the authors proposed a disaggregation approach to downscale the SMAP soil moisture over a small domain (including three 36‐km SMAP pixels), where the surface temperature is controlled by soil evaporation, the topographical variation is relatively moderate, and the vegetation density is relatively low.…”