Research Methods in Intercultural Communication 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781119166283.ch14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discourse Completion Tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The study applied a qualitative method, a study focusing on social world of which the data are taken from real people and real place [10]. In analysing WSL contribution to euphemism and use a discourse completion test (DCT) in collecting data; a questionnaire given to the participant with a certain prompt [11]. The questionnaire was distributed 70 respondents in 7 sub-districts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study applied a qualitative method, a study focusing on social world of which the data are taken from real people and real place [10]. In analysing WSL contribution to euphemism and use a discourse completion test (DCT) in collecting data; a questionnaire given to the participant with a certain prompt [11]. The questionnaire was distributed 70 respondents in 7 sub-districts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data are collected using a questionnaire based on the Discourse Completion Task (DCT). Discourse completion task (DCT) itself is a type of production questionnaire in which speech acts are elicited in the written form by some kind of situational description (Billmyer&Varghese, 2000 in Sweeney & Zhu, 2016). In this case, students are given a text complete with the context and they are asked to answer the answer based on the context provided.…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They cannot, however, be seen to replicate interactional data and to reflect what speakers would actually say in a particular situation (cf. Ogiermann, 2018;Sweeney & Hua, 2016). Field notes come nearest to such data but are limited given a bias towards salient and expected responses, the impossibility of verifying responses and also short-term memory restrictions, the latter which are particularly relevant where the researcher themselves is involved in the interaction (Golato, 2017: 23).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%