2014
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2014.2325494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discretization-Induced Stiffness in Micromagnetic Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vectors x, h d (x), and h ext hold the unit vectors of the magnetization, the demagnetizing field, and the external field at the nodes of the finite element mesh or the cells of a finite difference grid, respectively. For computing the demagnetizating field, equations ( 12) to ( 15) can be solved using an algebraic multigrid method on the finite element mesh [14,44,45].…”
Section: Finite Element and Finite Difference Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vectors x, h d (x), and h ext hold the unit vectors of the magnetization, the demagnetizing field, and the external field at the nodes of the finite element mesh or the cells of a finite difference grid, respectively. For computing the demagnetizating field, equations ( 12) to ( 15) can be solved using an algebraic multigrid method on the finite element mesh [14,44,45].…”
Section: Finite Element and Finite Difference Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The derivative and function evaluations in dynamical and static micromagnetic computations are very expensive, mostly due to the nonlocal stray field component. However, the use of a stray field algorithm that scales optimally or quasi-optimially with problem size such as the algebraic multigrid method [46,42,13], the fast multipole method [50,4,33] and hierarchical matrices [36], fast Fourier transform based methods (FFT) [50,16,49] or non-uniform FFT algorithms [29,15,20] is not sufficient to obtain a micromagnetic solver that scales linearly with problem size. Owing to the exchange interactions the micromagnetic equations can be considered as stiff [9] and the number of time steps in a dynamical solver or the number of iterations in a static solver increase with increasing problem size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, practical tests show that rough approximations of the solution of such preconditioning systems suffice. Suess et al [45] and Sheperd et al [42] investigated the correlation between the microstructure of the magnet and the discretization on the stiffness of the Landau-Lifshitz Gilbert equation. They show, that implicit or semi-implicit integrators of the Landau-Lifshitz equation with a preconditioned linear system for the Newton step, successfully tackles stiffness in micromagnetic systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is chosen to be a 3-element stencil, which is correct to second order, but when the exchange coupling is strong a higher order operator may be needed. It has also previously been shown that the spatial discretization with an analytical demagnetization calculations can result in the Landau-Lifshitz equation becoming stiff Shepherd et al [2014].…”
Section: µMag Standard Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%