2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-016-0417-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling the relative effect of light pollution, impervious surfaces and intensive agriculture on bat activity with a national-scale monitoring program

Abstract: International audienceObjectivesWe characterized the landscape-scale impacts of ALAN on 4 insectivorous bat species Pipistrellus pipistrellus, Pipistrellus kuhlii, Eptesicus serotinus, Nyctalus leisleri, and compared the extent of their effects to other major land-use pressures.MethodsWe used a French national-scale monitoring program recording bat activity among 2-km car transect surveys, and extracted landscape characteristics around transects with satellite and land cover layers. For each species, we perfor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
83
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(84 reference statements)
2
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used an acoustic dataset collected previously to study the effect of wind turbines on bat activity (Barré et al., ) because it was based on a random sampling design with high variability and no confounding effects in terms of environmental variables (Figure S1). The following environmental variables are known as good predictors of bat activity: type of site that is, hedgerow versus open area habitat located at an average of 86 m ( SD : 70 m) away from any hedgerow (Lacoeuilhe, Machon, Julien, & Kerbiriou, ; Verboom & Huitema, ), the distance in meters to a forest ( M = 700, SD = 506; Boughey, Lake, Haysom, & Dolman, ; Frey‐Ehrenbold, Bontadina, Arlettaz, & Obrist, ), the distance to an urban area ( M = 335, SD = 170; Azam, Le Viol, Julien, Bas, & Kerbiriou, ), the distance to a wetland ( M = 579, SD = 363; Sirami, Jacobs, & Cumming, ; Santos, Rodrigues, Jones, & Rebelo, ) and the total length of hedgerows in meters within a 1,000 m radius ( M = 3,439, SD = 1,622; Verboom & Huitema, ; Lacoeuilhe et al., ). The latter four variables presented important environmental variability, and a similar gradient between sites located close to hedgerows and those in open areas (Figure S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used an acoustic dataset collected previously to study the effect of wind turbines on bat activity (Barré et al., ) because it was based on a random sampling design with high variability and no confounding effects in terms of environmental variables (Figure S1). The following environmental variables are known as good predictors of bat activity: type of site that is, hedgerow versus open area habitat located at an average of 86 m ( SD : 70 m) away from any hedgerow (Lacoeuilhe, Machon, Julien, & Kerbiriou, ; Verboom & Huitema, ), the distance in meters to a forest ( M = 700, SD = 506; Boughey, Lake, Haysom, & Dolman, ; Frey‐Ehrenbold, Bontadina, Arlettaz, & Obrist, ), the distance to an urban area ( M = 335, SD = 170; Azam, Le Viol, Julien, Bas, & Kerbiriou, ), the distance to a wetland ( M = 579, SD = 363; Sirami, Jacobs, & Cumming, ; Santos, Rodrigues, Jones, & Rebelo, ) and the total length of hedgerows in meters within a 1,000 m radius ( M = 3,439, SD = 1,622; Verboom & Huitema, ; Lacoeuilhe et al., ). The latter four variables presented important environmental variability, and a similar gradient between sites located close to hedgerows and those in open areas (Figure S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study area, population density is 52.6 inhabitants per km 2 , mainly located in small villages or isolated farms where artificial lighting at night is scarce or absent. The effect of artificial lighting on connectivity (Azam, Le Viol, Julien, Bas, & Kerbiriou, ; Hale et al., ) was thus not taken into account in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the size of colonies was better predicted by the amount of artificial light at night (ALAN) than the proportion of urban area. This finding may arise from the fact that ALAN within landscapes is not systematically restricted to urban areas and may affect the adjacent habitats, thus reducing the foraging areas available for bats (Threlfall et al 2013;Azam et al 2016). Furthermore, ALAN-which could also be related to road densitymay act as a barrier to movement by altering gap crossing behaviour (Hale et al 2015).…”
Section: Landscape Characteristics Affect Colony Size At Different Spmentioning
confidence: 99%