2018
DOI: 10.1177/0300060518781636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissemination of cfr-mediated linezolid resistance among Staphylococcus species isolated from a teaching hospital in Beijing, China

Abstract: ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to report the dissemination of cfr and fexA genes mediated by linezolid resistance among Staphylococcus species.MethodsThree methicillin-resistant staphylococci that were collected from a teaching hospital in Beijing were identified as linezolid-resistant. These three staphylococci were Staphylococcus aureus, S. haemolyticus, and S. cohnii. Mutations in domain V of 23S ribosomal RNA, ribosomal proteins, and the cfr, fexA, and optrA genes were analysed.ResultsThe three … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
12
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that most (66.7%) of the cfr positive LR-MRSA strains exhibited the clindamycin, chloramphenicol and linezolid resistance phenotype validates previous suggestions that the phenotype is an indicator for the likely presence of the cfr gene 29 . Our findings identify with several previously reported cfr distribution of 100% by [30][31][32] amongst LR-MRSA but contradicts the results of lower rates of 6.25% and 7.1% reported by 29,33 . The observed contrasts among these studies might be due to variations in sampling technique and phenotypic confirmatory methods 30 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…The finding that most (66.7%) of the cfr positive LR-MRSA strains exhibited the clindamycin, chloramphenicol and linezolid resistance phenotype validates previous suggestions that the phenotype is an indicator for the likely presence of the cfr gene 29 . Our findings identify with several previously reported cfr distribution of 100% by [30][31][32] amongst LR-MRSA but contradicts the results of lower rates of 6.25% and 7.1% reported by 29,33 . The observed contrasts among these studies might be due to variations in sampling technique and phenotypic confirmatory methods 30 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Its effectiveness may be connected to the fact that, as opposed to the other antibiotics used in this study, linezolid is not routinely prescribed or administered. Conversely, resistance to linezolid observed in this study may have been mediated through ribosomal mutations (23SrRNA) or methylation of 23SrRNA by the horizontally transferred Cfr plasmidborne ribosomal methyltransferase [56]. The increased incidence of multi-resistant strains observed in this study may be due to the included study centres being secondary healthcare centres, and patients from adjoining districts and even villages are admitted for treatment.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Its effectiveness may be connected to the fact that, as opposed to the other antibiotics used in this study, linezolid is not routinely prescribed or administered. Conversely, resistance to linezolid observed in this study may have been mediated through ribosomal mutations (23S rRNA ) or methylation of 23S rRNA by the horizontally transferred Cfr plasmid-borne ribosomal methyltransferase [ 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%