2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissipation of DDT in a heavily contaminated soil in Mato Grosso, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure illustrates the vertical distributions of DDTs and dicofol in the soil profiles at the former DDT production site, and it clearly shows that the concentrations of DDTs (0.01–664.6 ppm) were much higher than those of dicofol, but much lower than in the soil of the former dicofol production site, especially in deep layer soil. They were also much lower than the average concentrations of DDTs (3800–7300 mg/kg) found in some reported heavily contaminated sites, but much higher than in urban renewal soil in Beijing . DDT concentrations at this site were much higher than that in soils from Hong Kong (0.007–0.31 μg/kg), the United States (<1 μg/kg), and that in agricultural soil of China. , They were close to concentrations of DDTs (0.775–226.711 mg/kg) reported by Zhao et al in measuring the soil around a pesticide factory in Zibo, China .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure illustrates the vertical distributions of DDTs and dicofol in the soil profiles at the former DDT production site, and it clearly shows that the concentrations of DDTs (0.01–664.6 ppm) were much higher than those of dicofol, but much lower than in the soil of the former dicofol production site, especially in deep layer soil. They were also much lower than the average concentrations of DDTs (3800–7300 mg/kg) found in some reported heavily contaminated sites, but much higher than in urban renewal soil in Beijing . DDT concentrations at this site were much higher than that in soils from Hong Kong (0.007–0.31 μg/kg), the United States (<1 μg/kg), and that in agricultural soil of China. , They were close to concentrations of DDTs (0.775–226.711 mg/kg) reported by Zhao et al in measuring the soil around a pesticide factory in Zibo, China .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The total OCP concentrations of S2 and S3, which were located in the center of the workshop, were much higher than those of S1 and S4 in the same soil layer. They were much higher than those not only in urban or agricultural soils from various countries, but also around a pesticide factory in Zibo city of China, while close to those in a heavily contaminated site . In particular, S3 showed very high concentration levels, among which the highest DDT concentration (6071 ppm) was in the soil layer at the depth of 2.0–2.5 m. The concentrations of DDTs and dicofol were hundreds to thousands of ppm at 2.5 m below the soil surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Além do uso ilegal, a presença de contaminação recente por DDT pode estar relacionada a três fatores: (i) uso do pesticida em campanhas públicas para eliminação de vetores de doenças como dengue e malária, conforme observado em algumas áreas dos estados do Amazonas, São Paulo e Paraná (Mendes et al, 2016) (ii) volatilização e/ou lixiviação a partir de solos previamente contaminados, conforme observado no Mato Grosso do Sul (Dalla Villa et al, 2006); ou (iii) presença de DDT como impureza no acaricida Dicofol e/ou degradação lenta do DDT, como sugerido em um estudo no Rio Jaguaribe, Ceará (Oliveira et al, 2016).…”
Section: Públicaunclassified