Dissolution and Enzymatic Degradation Studies Before and After Artificial Ageing of Silk‐ or Linen‐Reinforced Gelatin Laminates, 2

Abstract

Biodegradable laminates based on gelatin and on gelatin/starch blend reinforced with fabrics (silk or linen) were prepared by melt pressing. Due to crosslinking during the thermal treatment and in some cases, to additional crosslinking with methylenedi(p‐phenyl) diisocyanate, the fresh and artificially aged samples demonstrated improved mechanical properties, as reported previously. In Part 1 of this study on the environmental behavior of these new laminated composites, the simple dissolution in a buffer solution or water of fresh and artificially aged samples was considered. During this treatment soluble, i.e., uncrosslinked molecules were removed leaving a product resulting from addition reactions and consequent crosslinking. These processes take place during the melt pressing at 180 °C and cause a decreased solubility of gelatin. The present Part 2 deals with the enzymatic treatment of the same samples. We have implicitly shown that the gelatin moiety of the laminates undergoes proteolysis and that this process depends on the laminate composition. At the end of the treatment the enzymatic buffer solution contains only peptides and virtually no high‐molecular gelatin. The degrees of degradation vs. time dependencies differ for water and enzymatic treatment of the samples, indicating different processes in either treatment. The time‐course curves of the enzymatic treatment of different laminates and the kinetic parameters derived therefrom were analyzed. Thereby the effect of many factors on the accessibility of the gelatin moiety to proteolysis was shown. These factors are: temperature treatment, artificial ageing, the nature of the reinforcing fabrics, the “additional” crosslinking with methylenedi(p‐phenyl) diisocyanate, etc. The gelatin‐linen laminate is the most sensitive to crosslinking. There is a tendency that the crosslinking smears the differences in the time‐course of the absorption behavior curves of the different samples.Degree of degradation, β′, (related to only the gelatin) vs. time, t, for laminates: (a) uncrosslinked gelatin‐linen; (b) crosslinked gelatin‐linen; (c) uncrosslinked gelatin‐silk; (d) crosslinked gelatin‐silk.magnified imageDegree of degradation, β′, (related to only the gelatin) vs. time, t, for laminates: (a) uncrosslinked gelatin‐linen; (b) crosslinked gelatin‐linen; (c) uncrosslinked gelatin‐silk; (d) crosslinked gelatin‐silk.

In vitro and in vivo study to the biocompatibility and biodegradation of hydroxyapatite/poly(vinyl alcohol)/gelatin composite

“…6 The prolonged degradation time confirms that HA/PVA/Gel composite has a good degree of cross-linking, because pure Gel completely takes a degradation within a conspicuous short time. 16,17 Characterization of the mineral deposit SEM micrographs of the scaffolds immersed in SBF for 4 and 8 weeks are presented in Figure 4. They show that some minerals deposited on the pore walls of the composites after 4 weeks of immer- sion [Fig.…”