2021
DOI: 10.1109/oajpe.2020.3047639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Mixed Voltage Angle and Frequency Droop Control of Microgrid Interconnections With Loss of Distribution-PMU Measurements

Abstract: Recent advances in distribution-level phasor measurement unit (D-PMU) technology have enabled the use of voltage phase angle measurements for direct load sharing control in distribution-level microgrid interconnections with high penetration of renewable distributed energy resources (DERs). In particular, D-PMU enabled voltage angle droop control has the potential to enhance stability and transient performance in such microgrid interconnections. However, these angle droop control designs are vulnerable to D-PMU… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This extreme case focuses on the MG interconnection and CLPU in low-inertia systems. With the help of Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) and advanced control algorithms, MG interconnection is allowed [39] The large loads at node 99 are still not allowed to be energized, so no loads are picked up at the 76 th min. At the 83 rd min when a new branch (107, 108) is in service, the loads at nodes 107 and 108 are picked up.…”
Section: A Ieee 33-node Test Feedermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This extreme case focuses on the MG interconnection and CLPU in low-inertia systems. With the help of Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) and advanced control algorithms, MG interconnection is allowed [39] The large loads at node 99 are still not allowed to be energized, so no loads are picked up at the 76 th min. At the 83 rd min when a new branch (107, 108) is in service, the loads at nodes 107 and 108 are picked up.…”
Section: A Ieee 33-node Test Feedermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the trend of smart grids, modern EDS are migrating from an unsupervised and passive structure to a supervised and active one due to the installation of metering devices and the proliferation of digital protection systems [13,14]. In this context, the development of new control, monitoring, automation, and protection techniques is indispensable to meet the requirements of modern EDS.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopt this twolevel control structure for the following reason. Many large scale real-world networked systems, such as power systems, use a hierarchical control architecture with a dedicated secondary controller at each subsystem that maps its local output to a local control input [21], [22]. Such secondary controllers are known to critically improve the stability of the networked system using only local information [22].…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) j separation for this case, and consider conventional voltage and angle droop controls as primary control schemes. The set-point values and control parameters are given in Table III, and the distribution line parameters are selected as given in [21]. The system dynamics is as specified in (17).…”
Section: Test Case Iii: Ieee 123-node Test Feeder Network With Conven...mentioning
confidence: 99%