2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tine.2019.100122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed practice in mathematics: Recommendable especially for students on a medium performance level?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in line with some earlier studies which found that the distributed practice learning model is suitable to be implemented in teaching complex movement (Nazari & Ebersbach, 2019), (Dail & Christina, 2004). The distributed practice provides more breaks to students (Studer et al, 2010), and students and the lecturer can allocate it for discussing and evaluating students' performances and compared them with the perfect model in the video.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This finding is in line with some earlier studies which found that the distributed practice learning model is suitable to be implemented in teaching complex movement (Nazari & Ebersbach, 2019), (Dail & Christina, 2004). The distributed practice provides more breaks to students (Studer et al, 2010), and students and the lecturer can allocate it for discussing and evaluating students' performances and compared them with the perfect model in the video.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Gonzalez et al [26] have argued that the COVID-19 pandemic has changed students' learning strategies from an intermittent approach to study materials and class activities to a continuous one. Evidence that practice distributed across learning sessions is superior to practice concentrated in one exists [27][28][29][30]. It follows that differences in performance indices between online and face-to-face instruction may also lie beneath, specifically, in the contribution of course activities to end-of-course performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cepeda et al, 2006;N. J. Cepeda et al, 2008;Gerbier & Toppino, 2015;Nazari & Ebersbach, 2019;Toppino & Gerbier, 2014). Moreover, our results rather speak in favor of a large effect teacher incentives may have, as single problem set assignments were associated with overall increased performance and increased completion rates compared to self-selected assignments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cepeda et al, 2006;N. J. Cepeda et al, 2008;Gerbier & Toppino, 2015;Nazari & Ebersbach, 2019;Toppino & Gerbier, 2014). In this context, it was repeatedly observed that spaced learning-breaking down learning content into smaller bits covered in several sessions (separated by up to several days)-led to significantly better learning outcomes than massed learning reflecting long but fewer learning session on one and the same topic.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%