2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution, input pathway and soil–air exchange of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Banshan Industry Park, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our fugacity-based modeling shows that 3-ring PAHs (Acy, Ace, Flo, Phe and Ant) tend to evaporate from soil to air with escaping diffusive fluxes ranging from 0.79 to 713 μg m −2 yr −1 , whereas 5-and 6-ring PAHs (BaP, DahA, IcdP and BghiP) are likely to deposit from air to soil with deposition fluxes varying between 0.99 and 10.2 μg m − 2 yr − 1 (Table 2). These results were consistent with the findings of several previous studies, conducted in Beijing , Tibetan Plateau (Wang et al, 2014), Dalian (Wang et al, 2008) and Zhejiang Province (Zhong and Zhu, 2013) of China, and in Turkey (Bozlaker et al, 2008), that soil is a secondary source of low molecular weight PAHs, but a sink of high molecular weight PAHs. It is interesting to note that the mean escaping or deposition fluxes of Flu and Pyr ranged from 1.3 to 1.41 or from 0.17 to 1.7 μg m −2 yr −1 (Table 2), and the soilair fugacity fractions of Flu and Pyr ranged from 0.27 to 0.67 (Table S6), approximately within the range of 0.30-0.70 used to suggest the soilair equilibrium state of a target compound in a region (Harner et al, 2001;Meijer et al, 2003).…”
Section: Regional Implications For Soil-air Exchange Of Pahssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our fugacity-based modeling shows that 3-ring PAHs (Acy, Ace, Flo, Phe and Ant) tend to evaporate from soil to air with escaping diffusive fluxes ranging from 0.79 to 713 μg m −2 yr −1 , whereas 5-and 6-ring PAHs (BaP, DahA, IcdP and BghiP) are likely to deposit from air to soil with deposition fluxes varying between 0.99 and 10.2 μg m − 2 yr − 1 (Table 2). These results were consistent with the findings of several previous studies, conducted in Beijing , Tibetan Plateau (Wang et al, 2014), Dalian (Wang et al, 2008) and Zhejiang Province (Zhong and Zhu, 2013) of China, and in Turkey (Bozlaker et al, 2008), that soil is a secondary source of low molecular weight PAHs, but a sink of high molecular weight PAHs. It is interesting to note that the mean escaping or deposition fluxes of Flu and Pyr ranged from 1.3 to 1.41 or from 0.17 to 1.7 μg m −2 yr −1 (Table 2), and the soilair fugacity fractions of Flu and Pyr ranged from 0.27 to 0.67 (Table S6), approximately within the range of 0.30-0.70 used to suggest the soilair equilibrium state of a target compound in a region (Harner et al, 2001;Meijer et al, 2003).…”
Section: Regional Implications For Soil-air Exchange Of Pahssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The behavior of PAHs in the atmosphere depends on complex physico-chemical reactions, interactions with other pollutants, photochemical transformations, and dry and wet deposition (Delgado Saborit et al, 2010;Zhong and Zhu, 2013;Zhu et al, 2009). PAHs in the ambient air exist in vapor phase or adsorb into airborne particulate matter depending on the atmospheric conditions (ambient temperature, relative humidity, etc.…”
Section: Fate and Transformations Of Pahs In Atmospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we chose to test the action of B a P, which is a cytotoxic, genotoxic and carcinogenic model pollutant in the PAHs class. It has been found in air, water and soil3233. Moreover, B a P, like several other PAHs, has been shown to induce P-gp in other biological models of aquatic and atmospheric pollution51112.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%