1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-583x(97)80045-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of impurities implanted in InSb and InAs before and after annealing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results are summarized in Table I. Previous work reported errors of up to 24% in the straggle but the projected range was found to be accurate [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results are summarized in Table I. Previous work reported errors of up to 24% in the straggle but the projected range was found to be accurate [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Using an implant energy of 80 keV and a dose up to 4 ×10 13 cm −2 , creating a peak Be concentration of 1.1 × 10 18 cm −3 , minimal lattice strain is introduced to the crystal and only point defects are formed after the implant. The Be profile before and after annealing of Be implanted InAs has been reported by Gerasimenko et al [9], [10]. When comparing the Be profile against a simulation generated using software package Transport of Ions in Matter (TRIM) [11], errors in the straggle of up to 24% were found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation