1964
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-196446060-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of Lengths of the Normal Femur and Tibia in Children from One to Eighteen Years of Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
127
4
6

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
127
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This line is placed at a slope of 1 to reduce errors in drawing both horizontal and vertical lines to it. The other lines are placed in a way that the ratio of its X-coordinate to the Xcoordinate of the maturity line at the same Y-coordinate is equal to the proportion of adult growth achieved by that skeletal age as derived from the mean values in the tables of Anderson et al (1964) for boys and girls. In other words, if the maturity line slope is 1 (X = I , Y = I), then a skeletal age line with a slope of 1.4 (X = 0.7, Y = 1) shows that given a specific skeletal age, 70% of the total growth of the limb is achieved.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This line is placed at a slope of 1 to reduce errors in drawing both horizontal and vertical lines to it. The other lines are placed in a way that the ratio of its X-coordinate to the Xcoordinate of the maturity line at the same Y-coordinate is equal to the proportion of adult growth achieved by that skeletal age as derived from the mean values in the tables of Anderson et al (1964) for boys and girls. In other words, if the maturity line slope is 1 (X = I , Y = I), then a skeletal age line with a slope of 1.4 (X = 0.7, Y = 1) shows that given a specific skeletal age, 70% of the total growth of the limb is achieved.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of M-SLG has been reported by several authors (Timperlake et al 1991, Dewaele and Fabry 1992, Lampe et al 1992. Apart from failures not related to the use of M-SLG itself, discussion on the accuracy of this method focuses on the data about which M-SLG was based-i.e., measurements of North American children in the 1940s and 1950s (Anderson et al 1964). Regional and present-day differences in skeletal maturation (Porat et al 1991) as well as the tendency of people in industrialized countries to become taller (Van Wieringen 1987) affect the use of M-SLG.…”
Section: Paul G H Mulder2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used method to predict limb length discrepancy and determine maturation is the Moseley straight-line graph method [1,3,5,7,10,12,14,19,22], which is a derivation of the data published by Anderson et al [16,21,22], and which is easy to visualise because of the graphic format [14]. The accuracy of predicting limb length discrepancy by the Moseley straight-line graph is supported by only a small number of outcome studies [1,[7][8][9][10]22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If growth cannot be accurately predicted, over or undercorrection of the limb length may result at maturity [1,5,7,9]. Difficulties in predicting the growth include variability of skeletal age estimation [3-5 12, 14], unusual skeletal maturation patterns in some diseases [1,5,8,15,16], and inaccurate calculations by the physician [1,5,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annual physeal growth rates were obtained from the literature and a multiplier of 1.243 was used based on the finding of contralateral limb overgrowth in this population [2,3,7]. Based on our practice, surgical expansions were assumed to be 1 cm per lengthening procedure and noninvasive expansions were 0.40 cm each; 2-cm surgical lengthening procedures were included in the analysis for completeness although lengthening of this amount is not performed at our institution (Tables 3 and 4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%