1997
DOI: 10.3109/17453679708996177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The straight line graph in limb length inequality a new design based on 182 Dutch children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lengths of the low extremity in Caucasian of the 1990s have been reported to have steadily increased, and now are relatively longer than in the 1960s, though this difference has not been found to be significant (6,8,12,13). One of the reasons for this change in growth may be related to an increase in the average stature at maturity (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lengths of the low extremity in Caucasian of the 1990s have been reported to have steadily increased, and now are relatively longer than in the 1960s, though this difference has not been found to be significant (6,8,12,13). One of the reasons for this change in growth may be related to an increase in the average stature at maturity (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data have been used with some success to predict leg length discrepancy, although some modifications were later made by Moseley (10), and Paley et al (11) to simplify its clinical use. Some authors have reported different results that contradict those of Anderson et al (8), which were attributed to differences in ethnic origin, height, and socioeconomic status (12)(13)(14). Maresh (12) findings imply that a standard growth curve should be prepared by each country in order to assess any existent growth abnormality and to predict future growth at skeletal maturity, and that these be revised on a regular basis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases this is done by lengthening of the leg. Sometimes epiphysiodesis on the contralateral side is performed 13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remainder of the radial multipliers calculated from Gerver et al 15 showed minimal variation from the radial multipliers of Maresh 5 (Appendices 9, 13). Paley et al 7 demonstrated a similar deviation before age 6 years when they calculated the lower-limb multipliers for Dutch children reported by Beumer et al 33 The lower-extremity multiplier has been clinically validated for accuracy of prediction for tibial and femoral length, limb-length discrepancy, and timing of epiphysiodesis at skeletal maturity. 9,10 It is reasonable to assume that the upper-extremity multiplier is similarly accurate in such predictions.…”
Section: E5mentioning
confidence: 71%