2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12555-017-0544-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbance Observer-based Trajectory Following Control of Robot Manipulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the highly coupled nonlinear characteristics, the actuator fault causes obvious effects on the system dynamics; therefore, they can be easily detected through monitoring abnormal system performances. Following the literature of actuator fault detection and isolation, and estimation, such fault can be considered as matched or mismatched disturbances and observed by using observers such as extended state observers (ESO) [15], [18], [19], disturbance observers (DO) [12], [20]- [22], uncertainty and disturbance estimator (UDE) [23], [24], time-delayed estimation (TDE) [25]- [27], super-twisting algorithm [28], Kalman estimators [29], unknown input observer [30], [31], etc. Then, Fault-tolerant control (FTC) that combines these observers compensation with advanced control algorithms such as active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) [32], [33], adaptive algorithms [34]- [36], or high robust gains can be employed to address the influence of the actuator fault.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the highly coupled nonlinear characteristics, the actuator fault causes obvious effects on the system dynamics; therefore, they can be easily detected through monitoring abnormal system performances. Following the literature of actuator fault detection and isolation, and estimation, such fault can be considered as matched or mismatched disturbances and observed by using observers such as extended state observers (ESO) [15], [18], [19], disturbance observers (DO) [12], [20]- [22], uncertainty and disturbance estimator (UDE) [23], [24], time-delayed estimation (TDE) [25]- [27], super-twisting algorithm [28], Kalman estimators [29], unknown input observer [30], [31], etc. Then, Fault-tolerant control (FTC) that combines these observers compensation with advanced control algorithms such as active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) [32], [33], adaptive algorithms [34]- [36], or high robust gains can be employed to address the influence of the actuator fault.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the SMC methods mentioned above may fail to obtain satisfactory control performance for overhead crane systems suffering from unmatched disturbances. Regarding this topic, many modified methodologies have been substantially developed to suppress the unmatched disturbances, including the unknown input observer (UIO) (Hassani et al, 2017), disturbance observer (DOB) (Homayounzade and Khademhosseini, 2019; Lu et al, 2017), uncertainty and disturbance estimator (UDE) (Deepika et al, 2019; Londhe et al, 2017; Ren et al, 2015) and extended state observer (ESO) (Cui et al, 2016; Guo and Wu, 2017; Zhao et al, 2017). Note that all of these techniques require some plant information when overcoming the disturbances, and among them, the ESO is the one that uses less information as only the system relative degree should be known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observer-based control techniques exploit the compensation control structure of manipulator, and effective techniques have been developed. 710 Meanwhile, the observer-based sliding mode control (OBSMC) chattering can be reduced by decreasing the switching gain without sacrifice of the disturbance rejection ability of sliding mode control (SMC). In reality, an excess of control effort will be expended for suppressing the transients due to system uncertainties, if the developed approaches rely heavily on this conservative upper bound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%