2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diverging effects of two contrasting tree species on soil and herb layer development in a chronosequence of post-agricultural forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, Calvaruso et al (2011) saw a soil acidifying effect of beech, while Ewald (2000), Langenbruch et al (2012) and Verstraeten et al (2013) observed this effect in the presence of spruce, and Finch & Szumelda (2007) for Douglas-fir. Aubert et al (2004) saw an increasing occurrence of acidophilous species during beech stand maturation, while Thomaes et al (2012) concluded the same for oak stands. Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Namely, Calvaruso et al (2011) saw a soil acidifying effect of beech, while Ewald (2000), Langenbruch et al (2012) and Verstraeten et al (2013) observed this effect in the presence of spruce, and Finch & Szumelda (2007) for Douglas-fir. Aubert et al (2004) saw an increasing occurrence of acidophilous species during beech stand maturation, while Thomaes et al (2012) concluded the same for oak stands. Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…() saw an increasing occurrence of acidophilous species during beech stand maturation, while Thomaes et al. () concluded the same for oak stands. Augusto et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…First, higher microtopographic heterogeneity (Frouz et al, 2018) of spontaneously revegetated sites favours species diversity in contrast to traditional forestry reclaimed sites that are levelled prior to tree planting (Gilland & McCarthy, 2014;Mudrák, Doležal, & Frouz, 2016;Řehounková et al, 2016). Second, increased shading from densely planted trees together with thick litter layers alters site characteristics in forestry reclaimed sites, thus resulting in a decline in species numbers (Thomaes et al, 2012). Shading increases also on spontaneously revegetated sites as they develop towards woodlands (Řehounková, Lencová, & Prach, 2018), but the canopy is not as dense, which favours more species in the herb layer (Mudrák et al, 2016 (Sitzia, Campagnaro, Dainese, & Cierjacks, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then calculated the shade-casting ability (SCA) and litter quality (LQ) of the tree layer, weighted by basal area, for each plot (cf. Van Calster et al 2007, 2008, Baeten et al 2009). The ordinal indices SCA and LQ describe the shade-casting ability, from 1 (low) to 6 (high), and litter quality, from 1 (slow) to 5 (fast litter decomposition), of tree and shrub species (see electronic appendix 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thimonier et al 1992, Lameire et al 2000, Bernhardt-Römermann et al 2007, changes in forest management, canopy cover and composition (e.g. Van Calster et al 2007, 2008, Baeten et al 2009, Hédl et al 2010, and changes in the abundance of large herbivores (e.g. Kirby & Thomas 2000, Rooney 2009, Royo et al 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%