2021
DOI: 10.25035/jade.03.03.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Division I College Athletes’ Self-Perception: Investigating the Impact of Race and Discrimination

Abstract: Self-perception is the level of competency at which individuals evaluate themselves in certain areas or domains (Marsh & Shavelson, 1985). An individual’s self-perceptions contribute to their global self-worth and even predicts performance (Cuellar, 2014; Harter & Neemann, 2012). This study measures self-perception scores, as well as experiences with racial discrimination, of 306 NCAA Division I college athletes using the Self-Perception Profile for College Students (Harter & Neemann, 2012). Scores… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The college athlete population is often stereotyped as unintelligent, unmotivated, and unable to succeed academically (Comeaux, 2011;Riciputi & Erdal, 2017;Stokowski et al, 2016Stokowski et al, , 2020. However, such stigmas are often contingent upon the characteristics of the athlete (e.g., race, gender, sexual orientation; Anderson et al, 2019;Arthur-Banning, 2018;Comeaux, 2018;Gentile et al, 2018;Strehlow et al, 2021;Turk et al, 2019). Female college athletes are expected to be smart (Strehlow et al, 2021), while male college athletes are seen as "dumb jocks" (Comeaux, 2012;Cooper et al, 2017).…”
Section: Stereotypes Of College Athletesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The college athlete population is often stereotyped as unintelligent, unmotivated, and unable to succeed academically (Comeaux, 2011;Riciputi & Erdal, 2017;Stokowski et al, 2016Stokowski et al, , 2020. However, such stigmas are often contingent upon the characteristics of the athlete (e.g., race, gender, sexual orientation; Anderson et al, 2019;Arthur-Banning, 2018;Comeaux, 2018;Gentile et al, 2018;Strehlow et al, 2021;Turk et al, 2019). Female college athletes are expected to be smart (Strehlow et al, 2021), while male college athletes are seen as "dumb jocks" (Comeaux, 2012;Cooper et al, 2017).…”
Section: Stereotypes Of College Athletesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such stigmas are often contingent upon the characteristics of the athlete (e.g., race, gender, sexual orientation; Anderson et al, 2019;Arthur-Banning, 2018;Comeaux, 2018;Gentile et al, 2018;Strehlow et al, 2021;Turk et al, 2019). Female college athletes are expected to be smart (Strehlow et al, 2021), while male college athletes are seen as "dumb jocks" (Comeaux, 2012;Cooper et al, 2017). Stigmas placed on male college athletes are often escalated for Black male college athletes, who have their intellectual capability questioned (Comeaux, 2011).…”
Section: Stereotypes Of College Athletesmentioning
confidence: 99%