2012
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2012.0115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divorced pearlite in steels

Abstract: Steels containing large carbon concentrations are used particularly when a high hardness is required, for example, in the manufacture of components such as bearings. This, however, makes it difficult to shape or machine the alloys during the process of component manufacture unless they are first heat-treated into a softened condition. One method of achieving this economically is to generate a microstructure known as divorced pearlite, in which ferrite and cementite grow from the austenite in a non-cooperative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…By analyzing the simulated carbon http redistribution mechanisms as the transformation proceeds from different 'k' and DT, we establish the criteria which govern the transition from cooperative to non-cooperative mode. In accordance with the earlier theories as well as the experimental studies [2,11,12], the numerical results presented in Paper 1 show that the mechanism by which an advancing a=c front evolves to form a lamellar or divorced morphology is strongly dependent on the initial interparticle spacing (k) of the preexisting cementite (h) and undercooling (DT) below the A 1 temperature. We also identify the onset of a coarsening regime and amended the criteria for the non-cooperative eutectoid transformation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…By analyzing the simulated carbon http redistribution mechanisms as the transformation proceeds from different 'k' and DT, we establish the criteria which govern the transition from cooperative to non-cooperative mode. In accordance with the earlier theories as well as the experimental studies [2,11,12], the numerical results presented in Paper 1 show that the mechanism by which an advancing a=c front evolves to form a lamellar or divorced morphology is strongly dependent on the initial interparticle spacing (k) of the preexisting cementite (h) and undercooling (DT) below the A 1 temperature. We also identify the onset of a coarsening regime and amended the criteria for the non-cooperative eutectoid transformation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The LDC transition map generated by conducting phase-field simulations for three different undercoolings (5, 7.5 and 10 K) below the eutectoid temperature and initial particle spacings predicts the morphology that is favored for a given set of initial conditions during an isothermal transformation. In a nut-shell, the most significant contribution of the work presented in the current letter is the addition of an alphabet 'C' (acronym for concurrent growth and coarsening regime which is favored at smaller spacing and lower undercooling) to the classical Lamellar-Divorced (LD) map [11,13]. Further, the present numerical findings are also in complete agreement with the existing theory for the divorced to lamellar morphological transition; lamellar morphology being more favorable at large spacings and high undercooling.…”
Section: Concurrent Growth and Coarseningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al [12] study the influence of chromium concentration on the formation of divorced pearlite in a hypereutectoid steel. Pandit and Bhadeshia [13] amend the earlier theory of lamellar to divorced eutectoid transition, by accounting for the diffusion of carbon along the transformation front.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is sometimes considered that the proeutectoid cementite is needed in the microstructure to facilitate the divorced eutectoid reaction 53,54 that helps soften the steel in preparation for manufacturing operations. However, heat treatments can be designed so that the proeutectoid cementite need not be present in the final microstructure.…”
Section: Hypothesis and Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%