2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-591-6_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Barcoding Methods for Invertebrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, different regions of DNA are necessary to provide adequate species identification across lineages. The plastid and nuclear loci indicated here are the most broadly used DNA barcodes for major groups of organisms, including algae [88], land plants [4,89], fungi [5], invertebrates [6], amphibians [7], fish [90], birds [70], and mammals [87,91]. Abbreviations: COI, cytochrome oxidase I; ITS, internal transcribed spacer.…”
Section: Box 1 Building the Dna Barcode Library Using Sanger Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In practice, different regions of DNA are necessary to provide adequate species identification across lineages. The plastid and nuclear loci indicated here are the most broadly used DNA barcodes for major groups of organisms, including algae [88], land plants [4,89], fungi [5], invertebrates [6], amphibians [7], fish [90], birds [70], and mammals [87,91]. Abbreviations: COI, cytochrome oxidase I; ITS, internal transcribed spacer.…”
Section: Box 1 Building the Dna Barcode Library Using Sanger Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA barcode loci now most commonly used for plants [a combination of plastid rbcL, matK, and trnH-psbA with nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS)] and fungi (nuclear ITS) may never be as efficient and successful in identification as CO1 in animals. However, even for some groups of animals (e.g., some invertebrates [6], amphibians, and reptiles [7]), CO1 works poorly and other gene regions are being used as DNA barcodes ( Figure 1). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…marinus . In the absence of any differences in the mitochondrial genome or at least at the COI locus—a fast‐evolving locus often used as a species‐level barcode (Evans & Paulay, )—our interpretation of these results is that there has been a recent and rapid speciation event, and likely concomitant selection for traits associated with different habitats: wider carapace and the lack of natatory fringes in Pa. laevimanus (similar to other intertidal Pachygrapsus species) and rounder carapace and natatory fringes in Pl. marinus (similar to other Planes species).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…marinus. In the absence of any differences in the mitochondrial genome or at least at the COI locus-a fast-evolving locus often used as a species-level barcode (Evans & Paulay, 2012)-our interpretation of these results is that there has been a (Pfaller & Gil, 2016) or the same sea turtle (Frick et al, 2011) yet do not interbreed. Identifying the factors that both promote hybridization in specific areas and deter hybridization elsewhere would shed light on the mechanisms underlying the maintenance and merger of species diversity on a broader scale (Abbott et al, 2013;Barton, 2001).…”
Section: Low Species Diversity In Rafting Crabsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…All PCR, sequencing, and analytics were carried out at the Laboratories of Analytical Biology at the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution. Mitochondrial COI barcode region and partial sequences of 12S and 16S rRNA were obtained by standard protocols (see Evans and Paulay 2012). Unaligned sequences for at least one type specimen of each new species were accessioned to GenBank along with archival data for the respective voucher specimens listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%