2015
DOI: 10.4331/wjbc.v6.i3.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA damage responses in cancer stem cells: Implications for cancer therapeutic strategies

Abstract: The identification of cancer stem cells (CSCs) that are responsible for tumor initiation, growth, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance might lead to a new thinking on cancer treatments. Similar to stem cells, CSCs also display high resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy with genotoxic agents. Thus, conventional therapy may shrink the tumor volume but cannot eliminate cancer. Eradiation of CSCs represents a novel therapeutic strategy. CSCs possess a highly efficient DNA damage response (DDR) system, whic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the generation of MIC properties may be phenotypically linked to enhanced drug resistance capacities. MICs enriched with CSC-like features may benefit from resistant mechanisms of CSCs, such as a stronger DNA damage response (Wang 2015), elevated expression of efflux drug pumps (Schinkel et al 1994;Zhou et al 2001;Dean et al 2005), and ALDH detoxifying enzymes (Honoki et al 2010;Rausch et al 2010). Therefore, inhibitors of pathways involved in CSC regulation, such as antibodies against NOTCH, FZD, IL6R, and other relevant signaling pathway receptors, may also have a therapeutic impact on MICs (Brooks et al 2015).…”
Section: Drug Resistance Of Micsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the generation of MIC properties may be phenotypically linked to enhanced drug resistance capacities. MICs enriched with CSC-like features may benefit from resistant mechanisms of CSCs, such as a stronger DNA damage response (Wang 2015), elevated expression of efflux drug pumps (Schinkel et al 1994;Zhou et al 2001;Dean et al 2005), and ALDH detoxifying enzymes (Honoki et al 2010;Rausch et al 2010). Therefore, inhibitors of pathways involved in CSC regulation, such as antibodies against NOTCH, FZD, IL6R, and other relevant signaling pathway receptors, may also have a therapeutic impact on MICs (Brooks et al 2015).…”
Section: Drug Resistance Of Micsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to full-length L1CAM, recombinant expression of L1-ICD in nonneuronal cell lines affects gene expression of CRABPII and ␤3-integrin (11). In addition, it was shown that nuclear L1-ICD also led to up-regulation of NBS1 (Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene) via c-Myc, which plays a role in DNA damage checkpoint responses and renders human glioblastoma stem cells chemo-and radioresistant (7,14). However, little is known about the normal role of nuclear L1-type CAMs in the nervous system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased expression of major DNA repair proteins, including BRCA1, ATR and ATM, has been observed in pancreatic, breast and prostate CSCs [156][157][158]. Reduced DNA repair capacity in CSCs has also been reported (reviewed by Wang [159]). In any case, DNA-damaging therapies targeting CSCs certainly benefit from inhibition of DNA repair as well as from increasing the total DNA damage burden.…”
Section: Dna Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%