2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00226-011-0447-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA extraction from dry wood of Neobalanocarpus heimii (Dipterocarpaceae) for forensic DNA profiling and timber tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA extraction from fresh and dried leaves is a common practice in plant genetic studies. Nevertheless, few studies have reported on DNA extraction from dry wood (Tnah et al 2012) as it is still the major challenge. Once this obstacle is overcome, DNA fingerprinting technology is potentially an efficient tool to identify the origins of timber and track logs along supply chains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DNA extraction from fresh and dried leaves is a common practice in plant genetic studies. Nevertheless, few studies have reported on DNA extraction from dry wood (Tnah et al 2012) as it is still the major challenge. Once this obstacle is overcome, DNA fingerprinting technology is potentially an efficient tool to identify the origins of timber and track logs along supply chains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(DumolinLapègue et al 1999;Deguilloux et al 2002), Gonystylus bancanus (Miq.) Kurz (Asif and Cannon 2005), and various dipterocarps (Tnah et al 2012;Rachmayanti et al 2006Rachmayanti et al , 2009Yoshida et al 2007). Liepelt et al (2006) suggested that DNA extracted from ancient Abies Mill., Pinus L., Fagus L., and Quercus wood samples could also be used in genetic studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be because cp DNA was a high copy number in the cells based on sapwood. Many studies reported that the less potential inhibitors of DNA isolation and PCR amplification are present in the sapwood (Rachmayanti et al 2006;Tnah et al 2012;Yu et al 2016). There are many more living parenchyma cells in the sapwood than in the heartwood (Jiao et al 2014;Yu et al 2016).…”
Section: Indel Predictions and Identification Of C Micranthum And Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expert opinion based on genetic fingerprinting methods now suggests that these techniques provide a level of basic proof acceptable in criminal cases in line with the Penal Code; in forestry, this evidence enables those people who take felled trees away from a forest for the purpose of appropriation to be subject to the same liability as if they had engaged in stealing. Courts now accept that genetic profiles based on nuclear or plastid markers provide rapid and robust tools for comparison between evidence (foliage, wood) and material of reference (tree stumps) in the forest (Tnah et al 2012;Nowakowska and Pasternak 2014). It should be emphasized, however, that a minimum of 4-6 highly polymorphic nuclear markers, that possess between five and 15 alleles each, are required to provide suitable discriminatory power in forensics (Butler 2005;Goodwin et al 2011).…”
Section: Power Of Discrimination Of the Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent illegally harvested timber and products derived from such timber appearing on the market, genetic tools based on DNA markers have been developed (Asif and Cannon 2005;Deguilloux et al 2002Deguilloux et al , 2003Tnah et al 2012). These DNA markers are additional tools to be used alongside classical methods such as mechanoscopy and dendrochronology, which are often applied to investigate different forms of crime in forests (Yaman and Akkemik 2009); especially, when mechanoscopy or dendrochronology fails to provide sufficient evidence in investigations, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%