2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-14825-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do agriculture activities matter for environmental Kuznets curve in the Next Eleven countries?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The dissimilarity in outcomes may be due to the fact that they used CO2 emissions as a proxy in their investigation, whereas we opted for the EF. This comment is supported by the fact that Selcuk et al [29] attested to the EKC theory for Nigeria in their research employing the ecological footprint approach. Findings uncovered that the nexus between EF and GDP pursues a U-shaped path in Indonesia, which differs from the results of Sugiawan and Managi's [34] study.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dissimilarity in outcomes may be due to the fact that they used CO2 emissions as a proxy in their investigation, whereas we opted for the EF. This comment is supported by the fact that Selcuk et al [29] attested to the EKC theory for Nigeria in their research employing the ecological footprint approach. Findings uncovered that the nexus between EF and GDP pursues a U-shaped path in Indonesia, which differs from the results of Sugiawan and Managi's [34] study.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The member states comprising BNIVMT have been scrutinized based on the ECK theory, both on a country and a group basis. Selcuk et al [29] analyzed the next eleven countries, including Bangladesh, Nigeria, Mexico, Turkey, Indonesia, and Vietnam, and authenticated the EKC for the rst four countries. Onafowora and Owoye [30] analyzed a mixed country group, including Nigeria and Mexico, and the EKC hypothesis was unsupported in Nigeria and Mexico.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These contrary findings also confirm that the link between agricultural economic activity and emissions varies by region. Using the common correlated effects mean group estimator (CCEMG) technique, it was discovered that during the 1991-2019 period in Bangladesh and Turkey, agricultural activities reduced environmental degradation while in contrast, agricultural activities increased carbon emissions in Mexico [33]. In Azerbaijan, an increase in agricultural GDP reduced CO 2 during the 1992-2014 period using the ARDL bounds test method [34].…”
Section: Agricultural Economic Growth and Environmental Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade, research investigating the relationship between economic development and agriculture-induced pollution has gained considerable attention (Liang 2016 ; Ali et al 2017 ; Ridzuan et al 2020 ; Selcuk et al 2021 ). Among those, a few studies discussed agrochemical consumption (e.g., chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and agricultural plastic films) as a land indicator in the framework of the EKC hypothesis, recognizing them as a source of agricultural non-point pollution (see Tables 1 and 2 for an overview of the literature).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%