Do Co-Worker Networks Increase or Decrease Productivity Differences?

Abstract

Do labor mobility and co-worker networks contribute to convergence or divergence between regions? Based on the previous literature, labor mobility contributes to knowledge transfer between firms. Therefore, mobility may contribute to decreasing productivity differences, while limited mobility sustains higher differences. The effect of co-worker networks, however, can be two-fold in this process; they transmit information about potential jobs, which may enhance the mobility of workers—even between regions—and this enhanced mobility may contribute to levelling of differences. However, if mobility between regions involves movement costs, co-worker networks may concentrate locally—possibly contributing to the persistence of regional differences. In this paper, we build an agent-based model of labor mobility across firms and regions with knowledge spillovers that reflects key empirical observations on labor markets. We analyze the impact of network information provided about potential employers in this model and find that it contributes to increasing inter-regional mobility, and subsequently, to decreasing regional differences. We also find that both the density of coworker networks, as well as their regional concentrations, decrease if network information is available.

RETRACTED: An Adaptive Hierarchical Network Model for Studying the Structure of Economic Network

“…Researchers have used different methods to comparatively analyze the propagation of systematic financial risk under different scenarios and found a strong hierarchical structure. Garas [11] and Huang et al [12][13][14] modeled the business cycle dynamics for systemic riskiness to assess the likelihood of failure of financial institutions at different levels and argue that the failure of a single entity in it triggers a series of failures in the system, i.e., the failure of one or more financial institutions leads to the propagation of systematic financial risk on a larger scale. Battiston et al [15,16] introduce degree centrality in networks to compare different financial institutions and propose a new centrality measure DebtRank, which further extends the idea of centrality in networks, the impact of different levels of nodes on the network can be seen more clearly.…”

Social Networks and Individual Labor Market Outcomes - Evidence from Linked Employer-Employee Panel Data

“…They can positively affect individual labor market outcomes: they may increase the chance of finding suitable vacancies (Dustmann et al, 2016), enhance the quality of the newly acquired jobs or promote career advancement (Podolny and Baron, 1997;Lutter, 2015). At the same time, they might influence firm-level outcomes as well: informal ties can facilitate knowledge sharing within teams (Wei, Zheng and Zhang, 2011;Tortoriello, Reagans and McEvily, 2012), accelerate the creation and diffusion of innovation (Rost, 2011), enhance the productivity within teams (Fernandez, Castilla and Moore, 2000;Afridi et al, 2020), or even contribute to firm-level (Boschma, Eriksson and Lindgren, 2008) and regional productivity growth (Lengyel and Eriksson, 2016;Eriksson and Lengyel, 2019;Lengyel et al, 2021;Lőrincz, 2021).…”