2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do discourse markers exist? On the treatment of discourse markers in Relevance Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…A classic case of procedural encoding is the conjunction but, whose meaning guides the hearer through the comprehension process of the utterance in which it is present, by signalling the concept of contrast between the coordinated elements (Blakemore 2002: 90-91). Each of these two types of meaning may, or may not, be truth-conditional, in that each of them may, or may not, contribute to the proposition expressed (Bordería 2008(Bordería : 1414. For example, discourse connectives such as so and after all are regarded as procedural and non-truth-conditional, since "they encode procedural constraints on implicatures" (Wilson & Sperber 1993: 19) and they do not affect the truth-conditions for an utterance.…”
Section: 'Like' As a Pragmatic Markermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A classic case of procedural encoding is the conjunction but, whose meaning guides the hearer through the comprehension process of the utterance in which it is present, by signalling the concept of contrast between the coordinated elements (Blakemore 2002: 90-91). Each of these two types of meaning may, or may not, be truth-conditional, in that each of them may, or may not, contribute to the proposition expressed (Bordería 2008(Bordería : 1414. For example, discourse connectives such as so and after all are regarded as procedural and non-truth-conditional, since "they encode procedural constraints on implicatures" (Wilson & Sperber 1993: 19) and they do not affect the truth-conditions for an utterance.…”
Section: 'Like' As a Pragmatic Markermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mood indicators, interjections and intonation are also claimed to contribute to the construction of higher-order explicatures, but they encode procedures. Finally, pronouns such I and you or indexicals such as now or here are both procedural and truth-conditional in that they impose constraints on explicatures (see Wilson & Sperber 1993;Bordería 2008).…”
Section: 'Like' As a Pragmatic Markermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Por ejemplo, los marcadores del discurso, además de tener una categorización concreta o de desempeñar una función pragmática, suelen quedar asociados a una delimitación pausal en el discurso (Dorta Luis y Domínguez García, 2003;Martín Butragueño, 2006;Hidalgo y Padilla, 2006;Hidalgo Navarro, 2006b;Montañez Mesas, 2007;Hidalgo Navarro, 2007a;Pons Bordería, 2008;Briz Gómez y otros 2008;Cathala, 2011;Anscombre, 2011;Pereira, 2011;Cuenca y Marín, 2012). Como señala Cathala (2011: 109), "desde un punto de vista formal, los marcadores se caracterizan por su independencia fónica y sintáctica respecto de la oración".…”
Section: Modelo De Unidadesunclassified
“…No obstante, en la línea de otros planteamientos (Pons Bordería, 1998;Heeman, 1999;Cabedo Nebot, 2009;Briz Gómez y Pons Bordería, 2010;Cabedo Nebot, 2011), intentaremos explorar en este artículo la posibilidad de que esa relación inequívoca de unidad fónica-unidad discursiva pueda no ser tan estricta como pueda parecer en un primer momento. ONOMÁZEIN 28 (diciembre de 2013): 201 -213 Adrián Cabedo Nebot Sobre prosodia, marcadores del discurso y unidades del discurso en español: evidencias de un corpus oral espontáneo 204 Bordería, 1998;Briz Gómez, 2002;Briz Gómez, 2003;Hidalgo Navarro, 2007b;Cabedo Nebot, 2009;Hidalgo Navarro, 2011).…”
Section: Modelo De Unidadesunclassified