Do health insurance and hospital market concentration influence hospital patients’ experience of care?

Abstract

Objective To examine the effects of insurance and hospital market concentration on hospital patients’ experience of care, as hospitals may compete on quality for favorable insurance contracts. Data Sources/Study Setting Secondary data for 2008‐2015 on patient experience from Hospital Compare's patient survey data, hospital characteristics from the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey, and insurance market characteristics from HealthLeaders‐InterStudy. Study Design Hospital/year‐level regressions predict each hospital's patient experience measure as a function of insurance and hospital market concentration and hospital fixed effects. The model is identified by longitudinal variation in insurance and hospital concentration. Data Collection/Extraction Methods Hospital/year‐level data from Hospital Compare and the AHA merged by market/year to insurance and hospital concentration measures. Principal Findings Changes in patient satisfaction are positively associated with increases in insurance concentration and negatively associated with increases in hospital concentration. Moving from a market with 20th percentile insurance concentration and 80th percentile hospital concentration to a market with 80th percentile insurance concentration and 20th percentile hospital concentration increases the share of patients that rated the hospital highly from 66.9 percent (95% CI: 66.5‐67.2 percent) to 67.9 percent (95% CI: 67.5‐68.3 percent) and the share of patients that definitely recommend the hospital from 69.7 percent (95% CI: 69.4‐70.0 percent) to 70.8 percent (95% CI: 70.5‐71.2 percent). The relationship for insurance concentration is stronger in more concentrated hospital markets, while the relationship for hospital concentration is stronger in less concentrated hospital markets. Conclusions These findings add to the evidence on the harms of hospital consolidation but suggest that insurer consolidation may improve patient experience.

Prediction of hospital visits for the general inpatient care using floating catchment area methods: a reconceptualization of spatial accessibility

“…One major advantage of using FCA methods to predict hospital visits is their ability to account for spatial changes with high resolution (both at hospital and population level). This is especially important since there is an emerging trend to consolidate hospitals in developed countries in order to use synergetic effects [35]. Using FCA methods, the effects of changes regarding the number and distribution of hospitals as well as changes regarding the disease burden on the number of hospital visits can be measured.…”

Marketing Technique in Healthcare Services: A Narrative Review

“…As a marketing mix variable, people include all individuals engaged in providing services, encompassing medical, nursing, and ancillary personnel, regardless of their specific roles." 54…”

Do budget constraints limit access to health care? Evidence from PCI treatments in Hungary

“…Recently acquired hospitals seemed to lower their quality regarding patient-experience measures, while no change in clinical indicators was attributed to the transfer of ownership (Beaulieu et al, 2020 ). Patient satisfaction was found to be negatively associated with increase in hospital concentration and positively with increase in insurance concentration; moreover, the latter was stronger in the case of for-profit hospitals (Hanson et al, 2019 ).…”