2001
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do others judge us as harshly as we think? Overestimating the impact of our failures, shortcomings, and mishaps.

Abstract: When people suffer an embarrassing blunder, social mishap, or public failure, they often feel that their image has been severely tarnished in the eyes of others. Four studies demonstrate that these fears are commonly exaggerated. Actors who imagined committing one of several social blunders (Study 1), who experienced a public intellectual failure (Studies 2 and 3), or who were described in an embarrassing way (Study 4) anticipated being judged more harshly by others than they actually were. These exaggerated f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
119
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
12
119
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, everyday life offers many instances in which people seem to blame themselves for failures and unfortunate events under circumstances in which peers and even neutral observers offer more charitable attributions, and at least some laboratory studies offer similar evidence (e.g., Gilovich, Medvec, & Savitsky, 2000;Savitsky, Epley, & Gilovich, 2001). Second, taking credit for success and blaming failure on external factors beyond one's control may simply be rational; successes are intended outcomes that one plans for and works toward, whereas failures are often the product of obstacles too daunting to overcome or unforeseeable circumstances beyond one's control.…”
Section: The Need To See the Self As Consistent Rational And Moralmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…First, everyday life offers many instances in which people seem to blame themselves for failures and unfortunate events under circumstances in which peers and even neutral observers offer more charitable attributions, and at least some laboratory studies offer similar evidence (e.g., Gilovich, Medvec, & Savitsky, 2000;Savitsky, Epley, & Gilovich, 2001). Second, taking credit for success and blaming failure on external factors beyond one's control may simply be rational; successes are intended outcomes that one plans for and works toward, whereas failures are often the product of obstacles too daunting to overcome or unforeseeable circumstances beyond one's control.…”
Section: The Need To See the Self As Consistent Rational And Moralmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Those who believed that their reactions in the game revealed managerial skill and that they were being videotaped attributed a greater desire for sabotage to their fellow students than those who did not believe they were under scrutiny (Kramer, 1994). Savitsky, Epley, and Gilovich (2001) documented related effects. Participants committed an experimentally induced social gaffe-failing at a "simple" anagram test or being described in an embarrassing manner.…”
Section: Biases In Interpersonal Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, some research supports this claim. People some-times overthink the meaning of their own behavior (e.g., focus on their social blunders; Savitsky, Epley, & Gilovich, 2001), they overthink the meaning of others' behavior (e.g., read too much into others' reactions; Kaplan et al, 2009), or they do not detect or utilize feedback (e.g., Shechtman & Kenny, 1994).…”
Section: Are Meta-perceptions Distinct From Self-perceptions?mentioning
confidence: 99%