2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do student self-efficacy and teacher-student interaction quality contribute to emotional and social engagement in fifth grade math?

Abstract: This study examined (a) the contribution of math self-efficacy to students' perception of their emotional and social engagement in fifth grade math classes, and (b) the extent to which high quality teacher-student interactions compensated for students' low math self-efficacy in contributing to engagement. Teachers (n = 73) were observed three times during the year during math to measure the quality of teacher-student interactions (emotional, organizational, and instructional support). Fifth graders (n = 387) r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
75
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
8
75
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings concurred with the SDT (Ryan and Deci, 2000; Deci and Ryan, 2008) and previous studies on the relations of autonomy support and academic engagement (Reeve et al, 2004; Skinner et al, 2008; Chen et al, 2015; Hospel and Galand, 2016; Jang et al, 2016; Yu et al, 2016). Self-efficacy and intrinsic value enhanced the behavioral and cognitive types of academic engagement, which further supported previous conclusions highlighting the positive role of these two individual factors in engagement (Linnenbrink and Pintrich, 2003; Patrick et al, 2007; Sakiz et al, 2012; Martin and Rimm-Kaufman, 2015; González et al, 2016; Zhen et al, 2016). Students who experienced more boredom reported less behavioral and cognitive engagement in math.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings concurred with the SDT (Ryan and Deci, 2000; Deci and Ryan, 2008) and previous studies on the relations of autonomy support and academic engagement (Reeve et al, 2004; Skinner et al, 2008; Chen et al, 2015; Hospel and Galand, 2016; Jang et al, 2016; Yu et al, 2016). Self-efficacy and intrinsic value enhanced the behavioral and cognitive types of academic engagement, which further supported previous conclusions highlighting the positive role of these two individual factors in engagement (Linnenbrink and Pintrich, 2003; Patrick et al, 2007; Sakiz et al, 2012; Martin and Rimm-Kaufman, 2015; González et al, 2016; Zhen et al, 2016). Students who experienced more boredom reported less behavioral and cognitive engagement in math.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…On the one hand, students with high self-efficacy tend to expend greater effort on their learning activities and persist longer in the face of challenges and setbacks (Bandura, 1977). High self-efficacy contributes to high academic engagement (Linnenbrink and Pintrich, 2003; Patrick et al, 2007; Sakiz et al, 2012; Martin and Rimm-Kaufman, 2015). On the other hand, high intrinsic value will lead students to use more cognitive strategies and to manage their efforts more effectively (Pintrich and De Groot, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, some of the most commonly used measures of student–teacher relationships do not directly obtain student perceptions but rely instead on teacher report or observational approaches (e.g., D. P. Martin & Rimm‐Kaufman, 2015; Pianta et al, 2012 [Classroom Assessment Scoring System‐Secondary]; Pianta & Stuhlman, 2004 [Student Teacher Relationship Scale]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this conceptualization was shared in the academic community, a great amount of research has been conducted in order to provide empirical support to the theoretical idea according to which a positive affective relationship with a teacher might promote learning and positive adaptation within the school context [62] and the affective quality of the student-teacher relationship has been shown to be an important predictor of children's development and wellbeing [65]. Many studies have found that students with close relationships with their teachers are more likely to experience at school academic interest, engagement, achievement, self-efficacy, and motivation as compared to students with more distant relationships [66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78]. Particularly for children who are at risk of failure in school, an emotionally supportive relationship with a teacher can act as a protective factor and have positive effects on developmental outcomes [66].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%