There is a large consensus on the beneficial effects of early childhood care and education, especially for children from lower socio-economic backgrounds, as well as on the crucial role of professional qualifications. However, this consensus also leaves many crucial educational issues undiscussed and may therefore mask areas of profound dissensus. We argue how the apparent consensus instrumentalises children, parents and professionals. We also argue how dissensus may be essential for democratic experimentation and consequently, why the consensus may be anti-democratic. In contrast, we analyse some of the experiences with professionalisation of the workforce in the city of Ghent in previous decades, as examples that may be illustrative of other pathways to professionalisation, leaving more space for debate and reflection.Keywords: democracy; citizenship; civic learning; early childhood education; professionalisationThe consensus on early childhood and equality Over the last decade or so, there seems to be an overwhelming consensus that a) early childhood education matters for the developmental outcomes of children; b) that this is most salient for children 'at risk' for underachieving in the educational system in later years (i.e. children living in poverty and children from ethnic minorities); c) that this is only the case when early childhood education is of high quality; and d) that the early years workforce is one of the most salient predictors of this quality. In a first section, we will briefly illustrate the consensus in the academia as well as in policy on these four claims. Then, we will more critically try to uncover aspects that remain undiscussed and argue why this consensus constitutes a social order that instrumentalises children as well as parents and professionals and may be counter-productive for democratic experimentation. We subsequently illustrate this critique by drawing on studies on the professionalisation of child care workers in the municipality of Ghent, as these may indicate some possible ways forward. Or probably it is better to speak about side-roads rather than ways forward as it remains unpredictable where these roads are leading to.