2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-017-0671-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does demolition improve biodiversity? Linking urban green space and socioeconomic characteristics to avian richness in a shrinking city

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not related only to the plant biodiversity, but also to the diversity of animals. For example, Walker et al (2017) suggest that demolition activities, which are connected with the introduction of green spaces in cities do not increase avian species richness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not related only to the plant biodiversity, but also to the diversity of animals. For example, Walker et al (2017) suggest that demolition activities, which are connected with the introduction of green spaces in cities do not increase avian species richness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they do not necessarily have more large-sized green areas (>25 ha) than growing cities (Kabisch & Haase, 2013). Moreover, despite being "green," vacant spaces do not necessarily provide ecosystem services, as this depends on management regimes (Gardiner et al, 2014;Walker et al, 2017). From a resident's perspective, while a greener urban environment could present benefits, there may also be concerns about dangers-actual or perceived-from unmanaged spaces (Gulachenski et al, 2016;Nassauer & Raskin, 2014).…”
Section: Scope Of the Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…connectivity and to avoid areas where active urban demolition projects have taken place [35]. Since green space coverage is greatest in wealthier areas of Buffalo, the biases in sample selection create a similar set of outcomes, i.e., that bird communities are under sampled in lower income portions of the city.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…35. Median household income was positively related to the total number of checklists (β = 0.071, SE = 0.022, CI = 0.028, 0.114, Fig 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%