Does Learning from Giving Feedback Depend on the Product Being Reviewed: Concept Maps or Answers to Test Questions?

Abstract

Giving feedback to peers can be a valuable learning experience for a feedback provider. However, different types of products require different types of feedback, which, in turn, may lead to different learning outcomes. The current study investigates the effect on the learning of feedback providers of reviewing different types of products. Secondary school students (n =127) were randomly assigned to one of the two conditions: giving peer feedback on either concept maps or answers to open-ended test questions. Both types of product, created by the researchers, were comparable with regard to content: they included the same misconceptions and were both of average quality. Giving peer feedback was part of a chemistry lesson delivered in an online inquiry learning environment. Students’ post-test scores, their own learning products, and the quality of the provided feedback were analysed to check for an effect on learning. There was no difference in post-test scores between the conditions, but the quality of the provided feedback predicted post-test scores. This indicates that it is not the type of product reviewed that matters, but the effort that students put into giving feedback. Possible implications for practice and further research directions are discussed.

Fostering Graduate Students’ Interpersonal Communication Skills via Online Group Interactions

“…In agreement with our findings, the contribution of a similar course, which was provided to improve students’ interpersonal skills in parallel to content field has also been found to be effective in a study of Lopes and colleagues ( 2015 ). Dmoshinskaia and colleagues ( 2022 ) reported that students were interested in a course content although most of it was presented by the students themselves. They felt it was effective, emphasizing the importance of their active participation and feedback providing.…”