Does the Culture Service Supply of Green Spaces Match the Demand of Residents in a New District? A Perspective from China

Abstract

In recent decades, China has experienced rapid urbanization; one way to expand an urban area is to construct new districts. The construction of new districts in China began in the 1990s with the "Development areas", which focused on industrial development and were the main mode at that time [1]. Since the 21 st century, "comprehensive new districts" have become important carriers of economic transition in many regions in China; industry development is no longer the primary purpose of the new districts, and attention has been paid to intensive land-use and ecological environmental protection [2]. The number of new districts in China has increased rapidly in the past

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Supply and Demand in Urban Parks along “Luck Greenway” in Fuzhou

“…This benefit has been demonstrated mainly in urban landscapes with spatial heterogeneous arrangements of GBSs from neighborhood-scale to city-scale levels [8,13,14]. GBSs often provide accessibility to neighboring green spaces (GSs) for a special group of people or in certain types of ecosystem services [15,16]. The fragmentation of the urban green space (UGS) is widespread in rapidly urbanizing areas [17,18], which leads to a continuous reduction in ecosystem service capacity.…”

“…The fragmentation of the urban green space (UGS) is widespread in rapidly urbanizing areas [17,18], which leads to a continuous reduction in ecosystem service capacity. Landscape fragmentation can also lead to an imbalanced trade-off of supply and demand (SAD) for ecosystem services (ESs) [16,19] and a mismatch between landscape space and type [20]. Relevant studies have quantified services in urban parks as GIs to mediate the SAD balance through assessing quality, green equity, and accessibility to nature [21][22][23].…”