2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.08.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the Pulsatile Preservation Machine Have Any Impact in the Discard Rate of Kidneys From Older Donors After Brain Death?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their contralateral counterpart preserved by eHMP had all been transplanted with primary kidney function and all recipients being free from dialysis at 12 months postoperative. This is in accordance with the findings of Poredes‐Zapato et al . where the use of pulsatile HMP was associated with a decrease in discard rates of kidneys from donors older than 60 years by more than 20%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Their contralateral counterpart preserved by eHMP had all been transplanted with primary kidney function and all recipients being free from dialysis at 12 months postoperative. This is in accordance with the findings of Poredes‐Zapato et al . where the use of pulsatile HMP was associated with a decrease in discard rates of kidneys from donors older than 60 years by more than 20%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The aim of this observational study was to provide clinical data evaluat- This is in accordance with the findings of Poredes-Zapato et al 8 where the use of pulsatile HMP was associated with a decrease in discard rates of kidneys from donors older than 60 years by more than 20%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with SCS, HMP is complicated and costly. At the same time, HMP can reduce the renal discard rate (34,35). A systematic review showed that the costs may be completely defrayed by reduced requirement for hospital stay and dialysis associated with a reduced incidence of DGF and improved graft survival (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%