Does Wind Discourage Sustainable Transportation Mode Choice? Findings from San Francisco, California, USA

Abstract

This paper explores whether and to what extent wind discourages sustainable transportation mode choice, which includes riding public transportation, bicycling, and walking. A six month-long field study was carried out at four locations in San Francisco, a city that has been promoting sustainable transportation mode choice but that experiences high wind levels. It involved surveying pedestrians and on-site recording of microclimate data using various instruments. The survey adopted a mixed-method approach to collect both quantitative and qualitative data. Statistical analyses using Kruskal Wallis tests and ordinal logistic regression models identified the significant effect of wind speed on San Francisco's residents in estimating their discouragement for waiting at transit stop without shelter, bicycling, and walking. Qualitative data revealed a deeper understanding of how wind influences their sustainable transportation mode choice. This research argues for the need to adopt climate-based efforts in urban planning and policy and sheds light on the climate resilience of cities

Street walking quality of the ‘Centro’ district, Madrid

“…However, walking provides a number of health, social and environmental benefits for urban sustainability. From the mobility perspective, increasing the active-mode share reduces the use of motorised modes and their negative consequences such as air pollution, land take and traffic congestion (Kim & Macdonald, 2016). From a socio-economic viewpoint, walking does not rely on non-renewable resources and is accessible to most of the population regardless of their income level (International Transport Forum, 2012).…”

Measuring the effectiveness of San Francisco’s planning standard for pedestrian wind comfort

“…A body of studies used statistical analyses to estimate the impacts of microclimate and individual physiological parameters on perceived outdoor thermal comfort (Pearlmutter et al 2014;Tung et al 2014;Creemers et al 2015;Kim & Macdonald 2016). While some of them considered the dependent variables to have interval properties, meaning that the distances between each vote are equal for convenience of analysis, we argue that it may make more sense to regard them as ordinal since the distances are likely to be unequal.…”

Selection of sustainable transport system: a case study

“…Travel behavior and the choice of the mode of transportation have a significant influence on the sustainability of transport systems (Schneider, 2013), but the influence is mediated by various factors, such as transport policies, car ownership, household income, age (Mattioli, 2014), culture, travel distance (Cattaneo et al , 2018) and weather conditions (Kim and Macdonald, 2016). Song et al (2017) attempted to assess the expected environmental costs of accessibility; Colvile et al (2004) attempted to evaluate the road transport sustainability regarding the exposure to air pollution from traffic through modeling the movement of air, vehicles and exhaust emissions; and Salehi et al (2017) developed a method to minimize total carbon emissions taking into consideration speed control.…”