2009
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.200881253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain‐wall dynamics in bistable magnetic microwires

Abstract: In the present work we give an overview on the domain‐wall dynamics in amorphous glass‐coated microwires with positive magnetostriction. They are characterized by a peculiar domain structure that allows us to study the magnetization process of a single domain wall. The domain‐wall dynamics is characterized by at least 4 regimes. At low field, the interaction of the domain wall with the defects is observed that is characteristic for the adiabatic regime. At medium field, the domain wall moves in a viscous regim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4a. The inner structure relaxation of TCMFA wires is changed by two items: (i) the inner atom gathering and rearranging in a local region, and then forming long‐range ordered zones (LOZs) annealing at a relatively higher temperature; (ii) a dynamic magnetization process (domain‐wall motion or rotational magnetization) 22 along the direction of the transverse magnetic field H T . Once annealing is over, the atomic magnetic moment in LOZs is hard to recover to the initial position, and the changed domain is reserved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4a. The inner structure relaxation of TCMFA wires is changed by two items: (i) the inner atom gathering and rearranging in a local region, and then forming long‐range ordered zones (LOZs) annealing at a relatively higher temperature; (ii) a dynamic magnetization process (domain‐wall motion or rotational magnetization) 22 along the direction of the transverse magnetic field H T . Once annealing is over, the atomic magnetic moment in LOZs is hard to recover to the initial position, and the changed domain is reserved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The propagation velocity of this 180° magnetic domain wall was measured for values of the axial magnetic field between the switching field in the case of each sample and the maximum applied field, which is 10,000 A/m in this study ( H* ≤ H ≤ H max ). In all cases, the domain wall velocity increases monotonically with the applied field, which is a typical behavior for all amorphous ferromagnetic wires [ 22 ]. The curves that illustrate the field dependence of the magnetic domain wall velocity for the investigated (Co 0.94 Fe 0.06 ) 72.5 Si 12.5 B 15 submicronic amorphous wire samples are shown in Figure 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the presence of three DW velocity regimes in Figure 10, we ascribe the low-field and intermediate-field regimes to the previously described adiabatic and viscous regimes, accounted for in Equation ( 8) and ( 7), respectively. [67] In the low-field regime, the DW has low mobility and a negative critical propagation field, whereas in the viscous (stationary) regime, an increased and constant DW mobility result in the observed linear behavior.…”
Section: Different Regimes Of the Dw Propagation Versus Driving Fieldmentioning
confidence: 97%