2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0026990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doping concentration dependent piezoelectric behavior of Si:HfO2 thin-films

Abstract: Piezoelectric thin films are of current interest in science and industry for highly integrated nano-electro-mechanical-systems and sensor devices. In this study, the dependence of the piezoelectric properties on the doping concentration in Si:HfO2 thin films and their crystallographic origin are investigated. The Si:HfO2 films with a thickness of 20 nm and various Si doping concentrations in the range of 2.7–5.6 cat.% were examined. The relationship between the piezoelectric displacement and remanent polarizat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Internal bias fields and domain wall pinning on the other side would require diffusion/drift processes during wake-up, which are not observed [22]. Moreover, internal bias fields, domain wall pinning and a phase transition from the tetragonal phase do not agree with the recently reported displacement measurements, which fit nicely to the expected values for ferroelastic switching [12]. Finally, antiferroelectric orthorhombic phases would not explain the observed reorientation of the polarization axis by 90° [22] and recent density functional theory calculations coupled with X-ray diffraction data does suggest that this is not the dominating mechanism [30].…”
Section: Invited Papermentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Internal bias fields and domain wall pinning on the other side would require diffusion/drift processes during wake-up, which are not observed [22]. Moreover, internal bias fields, domain wall pinning and a phase transition from the tetragonal phase do not agree with the recently reported displacement measurements, which fit nicely to the expected values for ferroelastic switching [12]. Finally, antiferroelectric orthorhombic phases would not explain the observed reorientation of the polarization axis by 90° [22] and recent density functional theory calculations coupled with X-ray diffraction data does suggest that this is not the dominating mechanism [30].…”
Section: Invited Papermentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The possibility for nand p-type FeFETs [5] enables in addition a larger freedom for novel circuit designs. Moreover, this material system has spurred attention in other applications, like neuromorphic devices [6][7][8], energy harvesting [9,10], sensors and actuators [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, transmission Kikuchi diffraction did not observe a significant monoclinic phase fraction prior wake-up and re-orientation of the polarization axis to the out-of-plane orientation post cycling 10 . Combined with the high Curie temperature 14 – 18 and displacement measurements 5 , transitions from non-polar to polar phases are not supported by the experimental results as an origin for AFE-like behavior. However, antipolar orthorhombic phases could still be present alongside ferroelastic-switching 10 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…A pre‐existing orthorhombic phase has recently been confirmed by displacement measurements as well. [ 43 ] The stabilization of ferroelectric behavior upon field cycling can be attributed to stress relaxation upon cycling, e.g., by formation of defects such as dislocations or changes in the electrical and stress field distribution. A more detailed discussion is given in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Differences In the Wake‐up Behavior Of Hafnium Oxidementioning
confidence: 99%