1984
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90188-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doppler ultrasound measurement of cardiac output in patients with physiologic pacemakers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in subject characteristics, especially their age (young vs. old) and the presence of heart disease (cardiomyopathy, hypertensive heart disease), the types of pacemaker used (single vs. dual chamber pacemaker), as well as the method of measurements, may have affected the results. It has been shown that those with a single chamber pacemaker or with heart disease, usually had a decreased CO with pacing, when compared to those with dual-chamber pacing [23, 24] and those with a normal heart [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in subject characteristics, especially their age (young vs. old) and the presence of heart disease (cardiomyopathy, hypertensive heart disease), the types of pacemaker used (single vs. dual chamber pacemaker), as well as the method of measurements, may have affected the results. It has been shown that those with a single chamber pacemaker or with heart disease, usually had a decreased CO with pacing, when compared to those with dual-chamber pacing [23, 24] and those with a normal heart [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study result revealed no superiority of dual-chamber pacemaker over single-chamber pacemaker, particularly on stroke volume index and cardiac index; contrary to previous studies which demonstrated dualchamber pacemaker known physiological and suspected clinical benefits. [14][15][16] The rational explanation for this result was downgrade of dual-chamber pacemaker DDDR mode setting (dual chamber rate adaptive pacemaker) to VVI (ventricular demand inhibited) on long-term follow up (median 13.2 months)-in view of the fact that ECG evaluation showed only 33.3% atrial-paced on DDDR mode pacemaker, the rest showed atrial-sensed ventricular-paced or atrialsensed ventricular-sensed. Previous analyses of DDD (dual-chamber pacing and sensing with inhibition and tracking) pacing mode survival have reported that after 2.5-3.4 years, a total of 4-18% of patients receiving a DDD pacemaker are downgraded to VVI pacing, most often due to atrial fibrillation (50-75%) or atrial lead failure (25-35%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stewart i wsp. [36] udowodnili, że zmiana trybu stymulacji z synchronicznej dwujamowej DDD na komorową w trybie VVI powoduje zmniejszenie pojemności minutowej serca. Spadek ten zależy od obecności wstecznego przewodzenia komorowo-przedsionkowego i wynosi odpowiednio 30%, natomiast u pacjentów bez wstecznego przewodzenia komorowo-przedsionkowego -14% [36].…”
Section: Zespół Stymulatorowyunclassified