2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2017.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-balloon enteroscopy: Indications, approaches, diagnostic and therapeutic yield, and safety. Early experience at a single center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
2
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…DBE has been found to be therapeutically beneficial, and overall positive yield was 65 to 82% in recent years. [23][24][25] We could achieve a positive diagnostic and therapeutic yield of 72%. However, this may be due to the smaller number of patients in the current study as well as the presence of active bleeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…DBE has been found to be therapeutically beneficial, and overall positive yield was 65 to 82% in recent years. [23][24][25] We could achieve a positive diagnostic and therapeutic yield of 72%. However, this may be due to the smaller number of patients in the current study as well as the presence of active bleeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A nivel local se han publicado, hasta la fecha, una serie de casos de pacientes llevados a enteroscopia de un solo balón (1) y otra de EDB (19) ; asimismo, recientemente se publicó la experiencia específica en hemorragia (20) . La mediana de edad en este estudio fue similar a las series reportadas de EDB (5,(21)(22)(23)(24) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…La hemorragia digestiva potencial del intestino delgado fue también la indicación más frecuente de EDB en otras series de casos, incluidos los publicados en Latinoamérica (3,5,19,21,22,24,25) y en una revisión que incluyó 66 estudios con 12 823 procedimientos publicados entre 2001 y 2010 (26) . Lo anterior permite definir que es un método para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de esta entidad.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Mean intubation depth varies with the system used: 239 cm for DBE, 233 cm for SBE and 236 cm for SE in the case of oral intubation, and 130 cm for DBE, 123 cm for SBE and 88 cm for SE in the case of anal intubation. [14][15][16] The robotic endoscope is capable of self-propelling locomotion in the gastrointestinal tract. In 1995, Grundfest et al 17 published the preliminary results of a robotic endoscope based on pneumatic actuators with lighting and imaging capacities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean intubation depth varies with the system used: 239 cm for DBE, 233 cm for SBE and 236 cm for SE in the case of oral intubation, and 130 cm for DBE, 123 cm for SBE and 88 cm for SE in the case of anal intubation. 1416…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%