2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2012.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doubly labeled water validation of a computerized use-of-time recall in active young people

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the MARCA has been well validated [16,19], self-report can result in social desirability bias and errors due to memory lapses [32]. In addition, higher socio-economic status has been associated with more physical activity and computer use [6,8] so the higher levels of education and income in this sample could have biased the results, although the findings do not support this concern.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the MARCA has been well validated [16,19], self-report can result in social desirability bias and errors due to memory lapses [32]. In addition, higher socio-economic status has been associated with more physical activity and computer use [6,8] so the higher levels of education and income in this sample could have biased the results, although the findings do not support this concern.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The MARCA has demonstrated high same day test-retest reliability in adults (ICC ≥ 0.99) for minutes spent in screen time and sleep, good convergent validity for physical activity level with accelerometry (rho = 0.72) [16] and good criterion validity for TDEE with doubly labeled water (rho = 0.70, p < 0.001) [19].…”
Section: Use Of Time Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adult version of the MARCA has test-retest reliabilities in adults of 0.920-0.997 [28] for major activity sets such as sleep, physical activity and screen time and convergent validity between physical activity level (estimated average rate of energy expenditure) and accelerometer counts/minute of rho = 0.72 [28]. A comparison of the child and adolescent version of the MARCA with the gold standard doubly labeled water showed correlations of rho = 0.70 for total daily energy expenditure [30]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test-retest reliability, conducted on adults on the one day, was high for the domains of screen time and sleep (ICC = 0.990 to 0.997) [16]. Validity for physical activity level is moderate-to-strong compared with doubly labelled water (rho = 0.70) [18] and for sedentary behaviour, moderate to strong compared with ActivPAL (r = 0.77) (r = 0.77) [19].…”
Section: Use Of Time Measurementmentioning
confidence: 96%