Ieee Infocom 2004
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2004.1354509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drive-thru internet: IEEE 802.1 1b for "automobile" users

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
320
4
3

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(332 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
5
320
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…During this time, the Wi-Fi client connects opportunistically to APs along the route and manages to spend 223 seconds connected, transferring 34 MB. These "in the wild" results clearly show the potential of this untapped resource of open Wi-Fi connectivity and have a similar behavior to the isolated and controlled experiments in [5,6,14].…”
Section: The Experiments Routesupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During this time, the Wi-Fi client connects opportunistically to APs along the route and manages to spend 223 seconds connected, transferring 34 MB. These "in the wild" results clearly show the potential of this untapped resource of open Wi-Fi connectivity and have a similar behavior to the isolated and controlled experiments in [5,6,14].…”
Section: The Experiments Routesupporting
confidence: 67%
“…There have been experiments on a high speed Autobahn [14], in the Californian desert [5], and on an infrequently travelled road in Canada [6] where the environment and test parameters were carefully controlled. These works showed that a significant amount of data can be transferred while moving by access points along the road.…”
Section: G Vs Wi-fi Uploadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rented EC2 instances have 5 GHz CPU and 1.7 GB RAM each. Without parallel processing, the response time may be well over the average connection time of a mobile user with a roadside WiFi ranges between 6-12 seconds [24]. This makes it impossible for a mobile user to get the result in time in the same communication session although EC2 has a faster CPU speed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4] and [29], the drive-thru Internet is evaluated in a planned scenario where two APs are deployed closely along a highway, using IEEE 802.11b and 802.11g, respectively. The performances of User Datagram Protocol (UDP) and Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) at different speeds (80, 120, and 180 km/h) and scenarios (AP to vehicle, vehicle to AP) are evaluated.…”
Section: Drive-thru Internetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has demonstrated the feasibility of WiFi for outdoor Internet access at vehicular speeds [3]. The built-in WiFi radio or WiFi-enabled mobile devices on board can access the Internet when vehicles are moving in the coverage of WiFi hotspots, which is often referred to as the drive-thru Internet access [4]. This kind of access solution is workable to offer a cost-effective data pipe for vehicle users [5], and with the increasing deployment of the urban-scale WiFi network (e.g., Google WiFi in the city of Mountain View), there would be a rapid growth in vehicular Internet connectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%