2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drivers that motivate energy companies to be responsible. A systematic literature review of Corporate Social Responsibility in the energy sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
64
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, stakeholders impose coercive and normative pressures on companies [65,72] by forcing them to improve their performance to maintain their social license to operate [45,74]. These findings support previous research on sustainability drivers in organizations, which also identified governments, regulations and legislation, stakeholders' engagement [51,71,72], and industry associations [73] as external drivers together with a social license to operate and sustainability initiatives as additional pressures [51,71].…”
Section: Institutional Drivers For Implementation Of Sustainability Psupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, stakeholders impose coercive and normative pressures on companies [65,72] by forcing them to improve their performance to maintain their social license to operate [45,74]. These findings support previous research on sustainability drivers in organizations, which also identified governments, regulations and legislation, stakeholders' engagement [51,71,72], and industry associations [73] as external drivers together with a social license to operate and sustainability initiatives as additional pressures [51,71].…”
Section: Institutional Drivers For Implementation Of Sustainability Psupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Some of the external drivers were national governments, regulations, legislation, society pressure, stakeholders' expectations, and collaboration with external organizations, while connecting drivers included sustainability reports, license to operate, access to natural resources, and reputation. Building on this research, Latapí Agudelo et al [71] identified external drivers for the energy sector, including reputation, reporting, and social license to operate as connecting drivers and competitiveness, legislation and regulations, social commitment, and stakeholder engagement as external drivers. Furthermore, Johannsdottir [72] recognized various stakeholders as the most important external driver for large companies, together with legislation and reputation.…”
Section: Institutional Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this novel connection between employees’ cognition, CPP, SQ and CSR implementation at company level has never been unveiled in previous CPP literature to date ( Chang et al., 2010 ; Farooq and Salam, 2020 ; Latapí Agudelo et al., 2020 ; Wang, 2019 ). For that reason, now this study aims to offer a new comprehension into the minds of employees, and it will give an opportunity to the executives and policymakers to look at the implementation of CPP, SQ and CSR with the lens of employees’ perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…CSR) and environmental protection (i.e. CPP) in a broader perspective ( de Oliveira et al., 2019 ; Farooq and Salam, 2020 ; Latapí Agudelo et al., 2020 ; Rodrigues and Mendes, 2018 ; Sennewald and Baillie, 2021 ). Therefore, this study argues that instead of gauging the outcomes of CPP, SQ and CSR with a yardstick of monetary gains, profitability or enhanced organizational performance, there is a sheer need to marshal the resources for enunciating the micro level impact (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One more responsibility is philanthropic responsibility; it is also not mentioned in Ukrainian laws and regulations.According to international business practice this type of responsibility is considered to be the highest level of responsibility. It involves investing in the projects that significantly benefit society, but are not profitable (such as, environmental protection, donating to health and educational facilities, infrastructure, campaigns against poverty) (Osadcha & Svirko, 2014;Oliinyk, 2017;Mauricio Andrés, Lára, Brynhildur, 2019), or those ones with prevailing social goals comparing with economic interests, for instance, social entrepreneurship (Bilan, Mishchuk, & Pylypchuk, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%