1985
DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(85)90009-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DRL responding under uncertain reinforcement in rats after medial frontal cortical lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the sleep restriction-specific changes in peak area and bursting behaviour are very similar to what has been reported in PFC-lesion studies using a DRL paradigm (Cho and Jeantet, 2010;Nalwa and Rao, 1985). Therefore, our results support the hypothesis that sleep loss affects prefrontal cortical functioning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the sleep restriction-specific changes in peak area and bursting behaviour are very similar to what has been reported in PFC-lesion studies using a DRL paradigm (Cho and Jeantet, 2010;Nalwa and Rao, 1985). Therefore, our results support the hypothesis that sleep loss affects prefrontal cortical functioning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This DRL task requires an intact PFC, as evidenced by lesion studies. For example, rats on a DRL‐10 schedule (required delay between presses is 10 s) with 50% reinforcement rate showed significantly increased premature lever presses (<2 s) after surgical removal of their medial PFC (Nalwa and Rao, ). This suggests a diminished capacity of behavioural inhibition in the lesioned animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, delayed alternation and reversal learning tasks require the subject to generate different responses to the same stimuli from trial to trial. In the rat, the former tasks are impaired by ventral orbital lesions whereas the latter tasks are disrupted by medial PFC lesions (Eichenbaum, Clegg, & Feeley, 1983; Finger et al, 1987; Kolb, Nonneman, & Singh, 1974; Nalwa & Rao, 1985; Neill, 1976). Thus the ventral orbital region may be essential for simple response inhibition, whereas medial areas may play a role both in generating differential responses to familiar stimuli that change their association with reward from trial to trial and in suppressing responses to stimuli previously associated with reward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixed results were observed in lesion studies examining acquisition of DRL behavior. Several studies reported either a decreased reinforcement rate coupled with increased response rate while another demonstrated an increase in very short IRTs (Numan et al, 1975;Nalwa and Rao, 1985). However, several other studies failed to demonstrate an effect of medial frontal cortex lesions, although in one study the lesion may have spared the IL (Kolb et al, 1974;Finger et al, 1987).…”
Section: Comparison Of Neurocircuitry Underlying 5-csrtt and Drl Behamentioning
confidence: 91%