2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-010-0409-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dry and wet air-side performance of a louver-finned heat exchanger having flat tubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These drawbacks can be overcome by using either oval or flat tube. Compared to round tube HE, flat tube HE has better air-side heat transfer coefficient and lower pressure drop due to small wake area behind the tubes [15]. Moreover, noise and vibration levels in flat tubes are expected to be lower than that of circular tubes [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These drawbacks can be overcome by using either oval or flat tube. Compared to round tube HE, flat tube HE has better air-side heat transfer coefficient and lower pressure drop due to small wake area behind the tubes [15]. Moreover, noise and vibration levels in flat tubes are expected to be lower than that of circular tubes [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other experimental investigations (Kim et al, 2001;Zhang et al, 2001;Diani et al, 2016) generally confirmed the findings by Webb (2000a, 2000b). For a louver-finned heat exchanger having flattened round tubes, Kim and Kim (2010) showed that the pressure drop under wet condition was larger than that under dry condition, whereas the heat transfer coefficients were approximately equal. Generally, the condensate drainage in a parallel flow heat exchanger is poor because horizontal flat tubes block the gravitational condensate flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These disadvantages can be solved by using oval or flat tubes in HE. Apart from that, it is proven that flat-tube HE gives a higher air-side heat transfer coefficient with a low-pressure drop [9]. The shape of the tube and fin, fin pitch, tube pitch, tube arrangement and tube angle are all geometric parameters whereas air velocity and temperature of the tube are the process parameters that influence the heat transfer performance on CHE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%