Du paradoxe du mécanisme de la potentialisation de l’effet dormitif des barbituriques par la belladone. Etude expérimentale

Frommel, E; Fleury, Cynthia

doi:10.1159/000134960

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Related effects on gross motor activity have been reported by Tripod (1957) and by Frommel and Fleury (1960). Further, other anticholinergics, scopolamine among them (Carlton, 1961a and unpublished experiments), have been found to produce a similar accentuation of the effects of amphetamine on avoidance responding.…”

Section: Antagonism Of Activating and Cholinergic Inhibitory Systemssupporting

confidence: 64%

Cholinergic mechanisms in the control of behavior by the brain.

Carlton

1963

Psychological Review

544

144

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Several experiments indicated that a cholinergic system in the brain antagonizes a 2nd system, which activates behavior. Neuropharmacological considerations suggested certain drugs with which the activity of these systems could be altered. These experiments indicated that the cholinergic system acts selectively by preferentially antagonizing the effects of activation on unrewarded behavior. That is, there appears to be a cholinergic involvement in the mediation of the effects of nonreward. Although such interpretations are necessarily very tentative, there are inferential grounds for supposing that a cholinergic system selectively antagonizes the effect of activation on certain behavior and that the basis of this selectivity is the extent to which that behavior is unrewarded.

show abstract

Section: Antagonism Of Activating and Cholinergic Inhibitory Systemssupporting

confidence: 64%

Cholinergic mechanisms in the control of behavior by the brain.

Carlton

1963

Psychological Review

544

144

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

�ber die anabolische Wirkung von Novocain

Frommel¹,

Fleury²

1962

Acta Neurovegetativa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Roles of activation and inhibition in sex differences in cognitive abilities.

Broverman¹,

Klaiber²,

Kobayashi³

1968

Psychological Review

326

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A hypothesis that known sex differences in cognitive abilities reflect sex-related differences in physiology is offered. Females surpass males on simple, overleafried, perceptual-motor tasks; Wales excel oh mdre complex tasks requiring an inhibition of immediate responses to obvious stimulus attributes in favor of responses to less obvious stimulus attributes. It is hypothesized that these sex differences are reflections of differences in relationships between adrenergic activating and cholinergic inhibitory neural processes, which, in turn, are sensitive to the "sex" hbrmotles, androgens and estrogens. Studies Of the effects Of drug and hormone administration's oil these behaviors; dnd of sex hormones on adrenergic arid cholinergic neuro-transmitters are examined. Implications for cross-sectional correlative analyses of cognitive organization are discussed.

show abstract

Du paradoxe du mécanisme de la potentialisation de l’effet dormitif des barbituriques par la belladone. Etude expérimentale

Cited by 3 publications

References 1 publication

Cholinergic mechanisms in the control of behavior by the brain.

Cholinergic mechanisms in the control of behavior by the brain.

�ber die anabolische Wirkung von Novocain

Roles of activation and inhibition in sex differences in cognitive abilities.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About