Dual accountability and the nationalization of party competition: Evidence from four federations

Abstract

This paper assesses the extent to which party systems are nationalized in four federations. In doing so, the research addresses two questions. First, is dual accountability operational across decentralized countries, or do sub-national voters turn to national cues as a means to economize in a complex information environment? By bringing a cross-national dataset to bear on this question, we are able to provide insight into where and why dual accountability might operate. Second, what explains variation in the extent to which party systems are nationalized across countries and time? We build on previous literature to suggest a number of factors likely to impact the extent of nationalization. We examine those factors in the context of provincial-level elections in Argentina, Canada, Germany and the United States. Using national and sub-national economic data, we find little evidence of dual accountability in any of our countries. We find that economic performance matters little for regional electoral outcomes, and where it does, sub-national outcomes reflect national rather than sub-national conditions. More important are the roles of partisan relations across levels of government and election timing. Sub-national co-partisans of the nationally governing party lose votes, particularly as the time from the most recent national election grows. The strength of these effects varies across our cases in predictable ways.

Electoral Linkages in Federal Systems: Barometer Voting and Economic Voting in the German Länder

“…I employ a pooled cross‐sectional time series analysis to assess the responsiveness of changes in the vote share of the party of the federal incumbent or Land incumbent to Land or federal economic performance, previous party support and the political context. Studies of barometer voting and economic voting at the subnational level often use aggregate data due to the limited availability of individual level data at the subnational level (Samuels, ; Lohmann et al, ; Remmer and Gelineau, ; Anderson and Ward, ; Ebeid and Rodden, ; Rodden and Wibbels, )…”

Partisan Targeting of Inter-Governmental Transfers & State Interference in Local Elections: Evidence from Spain

“…In a comparative study of Argentina, Canada, Germany and the US, Rodden and Wibbels (2011) show that the interaction between federal and state or provincial elections becomes more apparent the more centralized the parties are. Bottom-up effects, from gubernatorial to national elections, are found by Samuels (2000) for Brazil.…”

Federalism, multi-level elections and social policy in Brazil and India

“…In some federal systems, subnational elections are clearly subordinate (such as Germany and Brazil). In such systems, voters use information about national policies, parties or presidential candidates as a heuristic for making decisions about how to vote in subnational elections (Borges & Lloyd, 2016;Rodden & Wibbels, 2011). In other multilevel electoral systems (such as Canada or India), subnational elections have greater autonomy from the national layer.…”