2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-pel.2019.1567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual asymmetrical dc voltage source based switched capacitor boost multilevel inverter topology

Abstract: The superior power quality of the multilevel inverter (MLI) compared to the two-level counterpart has increased its suitability for medium and high power applications. In the present work, a switched capacitor MLI topology has been presented, which utilises lesser switches and dc power supply and generates a 13-level output voltage. The detailed analysis along with simulation and hardware results have been presented. The comparative performance of the proposed topology has also been presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison has been done based on the number of components, voltage stress, voltage gain, and cost function. Based on this table, it can be noted that with asymmetrical configuration, the boosting factor of the proposed topology is higher than the topologies presented in [22] and [27]. It can be noted that the topologies presented in [22], and [27] generated 11 and 13 levels of output voltage using two dc voltage source with asymmetrical configuration, whereas for the proposed topology, 19 levels can be achieved.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The comparison has been done based on the number of components, voltage stress, voltage gain, and cost function. Based on this table, it can be noted that with asymmetrical configuration, the boosting factor of the proposed topology is higher than the topologies presented in [22] and [27]. It can be noted that the topologies presented in [22], and [27] generated 11 and 13 levels of output voltage using two dc voltage source with asymmetrical configuration, whereas for the proposed topology, 19 levels can be achieved.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It can be noted that the topologies presented in [22], and [27] generated 11 and 13 levels of output voltage using two dc voltage source with asymmetrical configuration, whereas for the proposed topology, 19 levels can be achieved. Further, the topology of [27] higher per unit TSV as compared to the proposed structure. In addition to the component comparison, a cost function (CF) has been defined which has been used to evaluate different topologies of Table IV.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Also, the proposed SCMLI1 needs a lower number of DC voltage sources as compared to the CHB inverter and topologies of [9–15, 19, 24]. In the proposed SCMLI1, the switch per level ( N SW / N L ) is 0.8, which is lower than the CHB topology and topologies presented in [12, 14, 16, 17, 19–24]. The topologies presented in [9–11, 13, 14] requires a lower number of switches than the proposed SCMLI1.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Proposed Scmlis With Other Topologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the above drawbacks, the researchers have been focused on switched‐capacitor MLIs (SCMLIs) [16]. These converters featured a less number of switches and less number of DC power supplies, which contributes to reduced weight, volume, and cost [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This topology doesn't require clamping diodes. The features make cascaded H-bridge MLI more preferable over other topologies [21]- [23]. CHB-MLI can have either a symmetrical or asymmetrical structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%