“…Therefore, the antitumor effect of ITs depends on several factors: the affinity of Abs for TAA expressed on the cell surface, the rate of internalization of the complex, and the inherent efficacy and specificity of the toxin 25 . Immunotoxin‐based anti‐PD‐L1 mAb is considered to be an effective tumor treatment method in theory, because: (i) the immune checkpoint protein PD‐L1 is broadly expressed in many cancers, 9,20,26,27 which is spectral in treatment; (ii) its expression is limited in tumor area but not in normal cells, the treatment is mainly aimed at tumor tissue, which makes PD‐L1‐specific treatment more accurate, and its side‐effects limited; (iii) ELISA assay showed that PD‐L1, as a transmembrane protein, was not released from the constitutively expressing PD‐L1 cell membrane; and (iv) the key is that PD‐L1 on tumor cells is glycosylated, so when anti‐PD‐L1 mAb is combined in the glycosylated domain, it will produce internalization, 28 which provides a good antitumor basis for IT‐based treatment 28,29 . At present, PD‐L1‐specific treatment, such as PDL1‐Dox 30 and PD‐L1‐AuNP‐DOX 31 in the form of an Ab‐drug conjugate, have shown some promising results.…”