2022
DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v28i2.730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Due To The Legal Non-Compliance of State Administrative Officers With The Implementation of Forced Money (Dwangsom) In The Execution of State Administrative Decisions

Abstract: Introduction: The non-compliance of the state administrative body or official with the TUN Court decision can be in the form of not revoking the disputed State Administrative decision, not revoking the TUN decision, not issuing a TUN decision, not complying with the obligation to pay compensation set by the court and not complying to rehabilitate the good name plaintiff.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the payment of forced money and administrative sanctions against… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanism of legal responsibility of the regional head for violating the prohibition for regional heads can be interpreted as a form of violation of the oath or promise of office (Pattipawae et al, 2022). The formulation of violating oaths and promises of office can include actions that are prohibited for regional heads.…”
Section: Regional Head Liability For Abuse Of Authority In Procuremen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism of legal responsibility of the regional head for violating the prohibition for regional heads can be interpreted as a form of violation of the oath or promise of office (Pattipawae et al, 2022). The formulation of violating oaths and promises of office can include actions that are prohibited for regional heads.…”
Section: Regional Head Liability For Abuse Of Authority In Procuremen...mentioning
confidence: 99%