1 Abstract 10 The yeast centrosome or Spindle Pole Body (SPB) is situated in the nuclear membrane, 11 where it nucleates spindle microtubules and acts as a signalling hub. Previously, we used 12 Synthetic Physical Interactions to map the regions of the cell that are sensitive to forced 13 relocalization of proteins across the proteome [Berry et al., 2016]. Here, we expand on this 14 work to show that the SPB, in particular, is sensitive to the relocalization of many proteins. 15 This work inspired a new data analysis approach that indicates that relocalization screens 16 may produce more growth defects than previously reported. A set of associations with 17 the SPB result in elevated SPB number and since hyper-proliferation of centrosomes is a 18 hallmark of cancer cells, these associations point the way for the use of yeast models in the 19 study of spindle formation and chromosome segregation in cancer. 20 2 Introduction 21 Microtubule Organising Centres (MTOCs) are critical to the process of chromosome segre-22 gation in eukaryotes; abnormalities in the structure or number of centrosomes is strongly 23 associated with human cancer [Nigg, 2006]. In S. cerevisiae, the MTOC is the Spindle 24 1 Pole Body (SPB). The SPB differs from metazoan centrosomes in its structure and in the 25 fact that it remains embedded in the nuclear membrane throughout the closed mitosis of 26 yeast [Fu et al., 2015]. However, despite these differences, there is significant conservation 27 between yeast SPB proteins and human centrosomal proteins [Jaspersen and Winey, 2004], 28 making the yeast SPB a relevant model of MTOCs. 29 Beyond their roles in microtubule nucleation, SPBs are thought to act as signalling 30 hubs, with recruitment to the SPB a key step in regulation of certain signalling pathways 31 [Fu et al., 2015, Arquint et al., 2014]. Various studies have used the strong interaction 32 between GFP and GFP-Binding Protein (GBP) [Rothbauer et al., 2006], to test the effect 33 of forced localization to the SPB, for example Gryaznova et al. [2016], Caydasi et al. [2017].34However, no systematic study of forced relocalization to the SPB has been performed. We 35 used the Synthetic Physical Interaction (SPI) methodology [Ólafsson and Thorpe, 2015] to 36 test recruitment of more than 4, 000 proteins to five locations around the SPB. 37 Proteome-wide SPI screens have been used in the past to probe the regulation of the 38 kinetochore [Ólafsson and Thorpe, 2015, 2016] and a set of 23 SPI screens was used to 39 generate a cell-wide map of proteins sensitive to relocalization [Berry et al., 2016]. Relative 40 to the screens of Berry et al. our analysis shows that the SPB is particularly sensitive 41 to forcible relocalization. As a result, we found that standard methods for analysis of 42 genome-wide screens based on Z-transformations were unsuitable to analyse these screens. 43 Efron [Efron, 2004] suggested an approach to multiple hypothesis testing, such as genome-44 wide screens, based around an empirically derived null d...